Re: Introducing Yoko, my new 165cm fabric Dagmar Beautiful D
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:29 am
Nice photos. I especially like the yellow dress and the cat outfit, beautiful.
The world's definitive resource on love dolls and erotic dolls for adults since 2001.
https://dollforum.com/forum/
Hello! I, myself, have a Dagmar ordered and I am in waiting. The same body variant you have (c-cup) but with the realistic silicone head. Of course as most do during this time, they buy more clothes for their coming plush princess of which I have been doing.CNR007 wrote:Here is her kitty outfit...
This was the impression that I got when I saw your Dagmar and also one from another fellow. According to this the doll CAN wear high heels since the foot pivots up and down. However, many told me that the foot is in the flat position (up) and it can turn side to side a little bit. But as you described it is the way the range of motion diagram illustrates. So I am thinking that this might be a change? But as you mentioned too, the diagram doesn't reference wrist or ankle movements. So perhaps this might have been a recent change? I could see some folks complaining that they couldn't have the doll wear heels. Personally I would sacrifice side to side movement for the foot to pivot so I could at least get her in 4" or 5" heels. The latter would put her at 5'9" making her waist around the hight of mine. So this would allow the use of standing up positions during bedroom time.CNR007 wrote:The best way to describe it that I can find: There is no ankle or wrist, but there is flex in the foot and hand. These photos should help.
Yes, I was told this and it is also represented in the diagram that there is indeed a spring mechanism for the spine. I think my guess is that it allows the foam to 'spring back'. I think if the body was left in a twisted or bent position for an extended period of time, the foam might either tend to stay in that position or be damaged altogether. But the spine has to give for the doll's intended purpose without breaking. But I do see that they could have incorporate both the spring and also the twisting ability, but they chose not to.My biggest issue was not with those areas but with the body. There is no twist or arch for the back. That makes posing a lot more difficult. It's because of the material used to pad it and the skeleton choice. I think unless they used some sort of stretchy material, there would be an issue with the material breaking inside under the twist. For the back arch, it does in fact arch but does not hold the shape. It feel spring loaded and returns to normal after pressure is removed.
The fact that you do not have to warm the doll up and she will warm up with just you just hugging her is another major selling point for me. But it was the overall easier maintenance and the light weight that finally sealed the deal.That being said, I love her anyways. So much warmer to the touch than the TPE and silicon dolls. I buy her small and x-small sized women's clothing and they work pretty well without modifications.
HonkyDonky wrote:She's really nice. where did you buy her from.