Irontech Doll 163 "First Impression"

Nirodha · Post by **Nirodha** » Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:27 pm

Jonathan- wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 12:38 pm Thanks for the detailed write-up, Nirodha!

I was strongly considering ordering an Irontech 163 just last month. I was ultimately put off by the listed weight, though, and decided on a different, lighter doll. I wish I had known then that the 163 is a very manageable 30kg!

But I'm glad that your 163 turned out so nice and that you're happy with her.

Oh how unfortunate, but I hope you like the doll you chose as an alternative as much as this one!

Nirodha · Post by **Nirodha** » Fri Feb 23, 2024 10:38 am

I wrote to Irontech Doll and asked about the weight.

The factory then re-weighed the Model 163 in the standard version and confirmed the weight of 30 kg + 3 kg for the head
and has already updated their website with the new weight information!

4891d · Post by **4891d** » Fri Feb 23, 2024 4:53 pm

Nirodha wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 10:38 am I wrote to Irontech Doll and asked about the weight.

The factory then re-weighed the Model 163 in the standard version and confirmed the weight of 30 kg + 3 kg for the head
and has already updated their website with the new weight information!

It's incredible that Irontech doesn't even think of weighing their dolls and updating their references as their models make technical progress!

Especially since it is a significant selling point.

BetterLoveDollForYou · Thu May 30, 2024 3:13 am

Great sharing, Nirodha! We've been following and learning from your posts.

shmancy_fancy · Post by **shmancy_fancy** » Fri Jun 07, 2024 10:06 pm

Great pictures & review, really helpful! I have a very random question about this doll. The Irontech website lists the thigh circumference as 46 cm, but just based on the pictures I've seen they look bigger than that. Would it be possible to confirm if the thigh (at the widest point near the top of the leg) is 46 cm?

Nirodha · Post by **Nirodha** » Sat Jun 08, 2024 6:47 am

shmancy_fancy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2024 10:06 pm Great pictures & review, really helpful! I have a very random question about this doll. The Irontech website lists the thigh circumference as 46 cm, but just based on the pictures I've seen they look bigger than that. Would it be possible to confirm if the thigh (at the widest point near the top of the leg) is 46 cm?

At the widest point her thights are a little over 52 cm.
Also her butt is 95 cm and not as listed on their side as 92 cm.
If I find the time I will check all listed data and write it in this thread

shmancy_fancy · Post by **shmancy_fancy** » Sun Jun 09, 2024 4:16 pm

Nirodha wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 6:47 am
shmancy_fancy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2024 10:06 pm Great pictures & review, really helpful! I have a very random question about this doll. The Irontech website lists the thigh circumference as 46 cm, but just based on the pictures I've seen they look bigger than that. Would it be possible to confirm if the thigh (at the widest point near the top of the leg) is 46 cm?
At the widest point her thights are a little over 52 cm.
Also her butt is 95 cm and not as listed on their side as 92 cm.
If I find the time I will check all listed data and write it in this thread

Thank you so much for checking, really helpful!!