Weight reduced dolls
- quicksilver451
- Active Poster
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2019 3:27 pm
- Contact:
Weight reduced dolls
https://siliconelovers.com/blogs/realis ... -sex-dolls
They list this at 168cm but I could not find this when I listed that doll.
They also list a brand starpery which I know nothing of and Zelex which I also know nothing of.
So my conclusion so far is 163cm h cup is the winner from this…but I would love feedback from anyone who has or has seen one. Right now we have miles76 and his awesome photo shoots as the mark to not beat…not going to happen but just come close…so any more info or pics on this.
Re: Weight reduced dolls
Hi, haven't responded to your request yet in another post, but I'm happy to provide info, pics and video of my experience with my 163H weight reduced model. She should arrive in a few weeks, barring any further supply chain issues. So it'll be a while before I can comment on thatquicksilver451 wrote:There has been a lot of discussion on here about weight reduced dolls. First starting with the idea it is coming. And now I hear of orders being made. From this I hear that silicon lovers is about the only vender doing them. Yea I have been out of touch on this but waiting for it. I hear the 163cm h cup can be had at not like 106pounds but about 70pounds a 17kg reduction. Not knowing if others can be done…and hearing it was up to 17kg I wondered if and where this might vary. So I reached out to silicon lovers and they sent me this link:
https://siliconelovers.com/blogs/realis ... -sex-dolls
They list this at 168cm but I could not find this when I listed that doll.
They also list a brand starpery which I know nothing of and Zelex which I also know nothing of.
So my conclusion so far is 163cm h cup is the winner from this…but I would love feedback from anyone who has or has seen one. Right now we have miles76 and his awesome photo shoots as the mark to not beat…not going to happen but just come close…so any more info or pics on this.
- Headless_Too
- Active Member
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 2:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: Weight reduced dolls
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=150834
WM 164F head #398 & #423
viewtopic.php?p=2144143#p2144143
WM 164J head #39 & #59
viewtopic.php?p=2290157#p2290157
- timetraveler1
- Doll Visionary
- Posts: 12353
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 12:00 am
- Location: u.s.a.
- Contact:
Re: Weight reduced dolls
- dollsfan64
- Active Member
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2021 3:09 am
- Contact:
Re: Weight reduced dolls
I thought if they added a hollow rib cage it would give the doll added proportions without increasing the weight.
- subcyclist
- Senior Member
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2018 11:51 am
- Location: NoCar (US)
- Contact:
Re: Weight reduced dolls
dollsfan64 wrote:I can see a need for light dolls for various reasons but I think some heaviness adds realism to the experience though it is 'dead weight'.
I thought if they added a hollow rib cage it would give the doll added proportions without increasing the weight.
A hollow rib cage might also create more realistic breast movement. Currently, a doll's breasts move in concert with her torso 'flesh.' With a rib cage of some type, the breasts would move separately from a static torso, much like how a woman's breasts move against her rib cage. And, there would be a more realistic sensation, from the resistance of the rib cage, when hugging a doll with this feature; if we ever see it. So, this design change could have many positive benefits - less weight, enhanced feel, more realistic breast movement. I hope that some doll designer reads your idea here, implements it, and that it spreads like wildfire to all manufacturers - like the gel breasts and better hand skeletons we now have available.
Annika - RLSD 141F + WM 195 (viewtopic.php?f=240&t=151741)
Larissa - WM 174G + YL133
Member of the Curvy Girl Asstronomy League (CGAL) - "We lustfully observe their stellar (m)asses!"
- quicksilver451
- Active Poster
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2019 3:27 pm
- Contact:
Re: Weight reduced dolls
well, that is a interesting point for me at least...
This is being rolled out to one vendor at least in the case of the WM DOLL 163cm h-cup.
I have seen a youtube video that verifies with a scale that 17g weight loss is achieved in this model. And the doll looks about the same...at least me. Yea don't have the link in front of me at the moment. let me know if you want me to post it here...it's been posted on this site before just not on this thread.
Well, wanting to know more about what is going on...does WM DOLL consider this feature to be in Beta release...so they don't want a huge numbers of these in the wild...if they don't hold up to non lab conditions...
So I reached out to one the vendors that is reputable but does not offer this at least on there site...to see what is going on...if I get a reply I will share that. If anyone knows anything at all of this situation please let me and anyone else know.
- quicksilver451
- Active Poster
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2019 3:27 pm
- Contact:
Re: Weight reduced dolls
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr3B1bv-Ots
I did hear back from the vendor...they said they was going to ask WM-DOLL for me.
So at first I am confused by that...but then ok maybe it is a global manufacturer decision.
I will let you know when I know.
- LatexLadyLover
- Senior Member
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Weight reduced dolls
Re: Weight reduced dolls
- quicksilver451
- Active Poster
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2019 3:27 pm
- Contact:
Re: Weight reduced dolls
ChittyBA wrote:I have a 168E with weight reduction option. She is definitely lighter but at the cost of softness. The foam core, which I find is the whole body, makes her very firm to the tough and the movement of the skeleton is restricted as the foam encases it with the TPE “layer” on top.
Ok is that 168E a WMDoll or a different brand? Good info to know...thanks for that.
Re: Weight reduced dolls
I have found that with the weight reduction the doll is much lighter but you lose some of the benefits to full TPE flexibility.
Maybe the techniques are still new but with my doll I think the skeleton was put in the mould a bit contorted e.g one shoulder higher than the other. So the foam core around her does not allow me to really adjusted the skeleton. Again, variable quality control in the process.
Also, the foam core may/will hinder any potential repairs that may need to be done.
However, I will say that the weight reduction firmness does make the doll body feel more durable. I feel more comfortable moving her around and not worrying too much about damaging her (or me).
- Headless_Too
- Active Member
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 2:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: Weight reduced dolls
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=150834
WM 164F head #398 & #423
viewtopic.php?p=2144143#p2144143
WM 164J head #39 & #59
viewtopic.php?p=2290157#p2290157
- LatexLadyLover
- Senior Member
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Weight reduced dolls
- avante
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:23 am
- Location: Holland - the Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Weight reduced dolls
And second the remark made by subcyclist about the ribcase - breast movement; that sounds like a benefit; if you're being overly critical turned torsos on most dolls kinda deform them titties...would be interested to see if this effect is less / gone with the weight reduction.
My doll experience : WM 158D tales & pics: viewtopic.php?f=215&t=85063&start=465