WM166C in Angel Kiss Silicone
WM166C in Angel Kiss Silicone
I want a 166C in silicone.
NO, the AK165cm is NOT the same.
I want the athletic build, ribcage detail, round plump bad love hole placement ass, 20" wait, 33" hips, and hourglass shape.
Will Angel Kiss make it?
What would WM or AK do if another maker made a doll body 99% the same?
- AngelKissLoveDoll
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: WM166C in Angel Kiss Silicone
There may be differences due to manual measurement.Speedious wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2023 7:31 pm I have a 166C, in TPE of course.
I want a 166C in silicone.
NO, the AK165cm is NOT the same.
I want the athletic build, ribcage detail, round plump bad love hole placement ass, 20" wait, 33" hips, and hourglass shape.
Will Angel Kiss make it?
What would WM or AK do if another maker made a doll body 99% the same?
Email: Support@angelkisslovedoll.com
Website: angelkisslovedoll.com
Re: WM166C in Angel Kiss Silicone
- curious_person
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:48 am
- Contact:
Re: WM166C in Angel Kiss Silicone
now what if they were to do an "AK172D" i.e wm172d alike but with improved lhp..
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2021 12:20 pm
- Contact:
Re: WM166C in Angel Kiss Silicone
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2021 12:20 pm
- Contact:
Re: WM166C in Angel Kiss Silicone
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2021 12:20 pm
- Contact:
Re: WM166C in Angel Kiss Silicone
Compared to the first WM promo photosets, the actual AK2 presents with a much slimmer lower body and thighs, and significantly larger breasts than the photos that initially appeared. I wonder if the mold was modified...? The AK2 gel breasts, at least in the new soft silicone, actually feel softer than the original 166C TPE. Weight and balance are similar in practical terms. Weight reduction is seamless, although the soft-to-hard silicone transitions at the wrists and feet are detectable. Other than material used, and the far more anatomically-correct mouth and moveable jaw of the LS# head, it seems almost like a refined update of the 166C, which presumably was the original intent. I wasn't expecting this, but I think I like it.