THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
- shigowa68
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2021 12:35 pm
- Location: Yorkshire - UK
- Contact:
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
WM162F (shared) - Nova(#74) & Chiana(#230)
viewtopic.php?t=140650
Galleryhttps://dollalbum.com/dollgallery/index.php?cat=15446
Skeleton Overhaulviewtopic.php?t=152581
- thepride724
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2017 7:14 am
- Contact:
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
WM Dolls News wrote:What you probably don't know yet is that the same body will be made with a different breast size. The big question is: “will the boobs be bigger or smaller?“
What would you prefer guys?
Ted
I agree, that breast size is perfect on her.King Solo wrote:I think her breast are perfect.... especially the way their shaped.
But, if WM is going to make a different breast size, I'm hoping smaller. They already have the 174G which is about the same height and a larger size would be too similar to that one in my opinion.
Layla's Thread
Layla's Instagram
Shanna & Shannon’s Instagram
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
My feelings exactly. She would look a lot better with smaller breasts.melenerj wrote:I would like to see smaller breasts. Currently, her breasts are proportionally large for her thin torso/waist. I think slightly smaller breasts would make the proportions look more realistic.WM Dolls News wrote:Hello,
What you probably don't know yet is that the same body will be made with a different breast size. The big question is: “will the boobs be bigger or smaller?“
What would you prefer guys?
Ted
Sophie - JY 175 (JY Head #167)
Valentina - JY 175 (JY Head #101)
Kiania - Sino 161 (Heads S6 & S7)
Rashona - WM 172B (WM Head #64)
Helga - JY 166 (JY head #101)
Patsy - JY 166 (JY Head #102)
Ingrid - JY 166 (SM Head #76)
Monique - JY 165SR (JY Head #134)
-
- Active Poster
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2020 3:05 am
- Contact:
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
- dreamer from Russia
- Senior Member
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:57 am
- Contact:
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
And what is this head. Sorry, but I don't recognize her in the "make-up". And won't a new doll with smaller breasts come out with her?WM Dolls News wrote:
- Dolllove1991
- Doll Elder
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2017 4:55 am
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
The size of the breast are great for this body! Pls dont change it .
The shape of her breast reminds me of the younger VERONICA ZEMANOVA
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
From what Ted has said, there is a version with different size breasts coming out as well. There are quite a few of us here who are hoping that the breasts will be smaller.bbgng8 wrote:She is PERFECT! I'm sold.
The size of the breast are great for this body! Pls dont change it .
The shape of her breast reminds me of the younger VERONICA ZEMANOVA
I do not believe that the version you are seeing in the photos is going to be changed.
Sophie - JY 175 (JY Head #167)
Valentina - JY 175 (JY Head #101)
Kiania - Sino 161 (Heads S6 & S7)
Rashona - WM 172B (WM Head #64)
Helga - JY 166 (JY head #101)
Patsy - JY 166 (JY Head #102)
Ingrid - JY 166 (SM Head #76)
Monique - JY 165SR (JY Head #134)
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
This is pretty much my feeling too. The overall leg length is fine in relation to the length of the torso, but the thighs need to be longer and the shins shorter.Chronos wrote:I like everything but the extreme stretched calves. This is not a 175cm but a 168cm with calves stretched 7cm too long. The elastic calves not only look weird but get in the way when in the sac
I think that the thighs could be lengthened so that the centre of the knee caps was more or less in the centre of the white circles on the attached photo. Overlong, skinny shins/calves was the main reason I avoided the WM168 when I was looking for an ebony doll and went for the 172B instead.
Sophie - JY 175 (JY Head #167)
Valentina - JY 175 (JY Head #101)
Kiania - Sino 161 (Heads S6 & S7)
Rashona - WM 172B (WM Head #64)
Helga - JY 166 (JY head #101)
Patsy - JY 166 (JY Head #102)
Ingrid - JY 166 (SM Head #76)
Monique - JY 165SR (JY Head #134)
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
1 - Boobs that part nicely to the side, with very nice side boob
2 - A little tummy, she works out but keeps it feminine still
3 - Bellybutton that is longer
4 - Cameltoe!
5 - Back dimples
6 - Hipbone with lines tapering to the vagina
I'll wait to see the gap and LHP photos.
This one is a winner to me! Always wowing me WM! first the 166C then the 172D, 174G now this! My favorite one yet!
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
Indeed so, but they are unlikely to give her a thicker waist due to the weight penalty.nicvncnt wrote:Smaller boobs, thicker waist.
We have to rely on the likes of XY to consistently give us realistic-looking sculpts, but it comes at the cost of increased weight.
Sophie - JY 175 (JY Head #167)
Valentina - JY 175 (JY Head #101)
Kiania - Sino 161 (Heads S6 & S7)
Rashona - WM 172B (WM Head #64)
Helga - JY 166 (JY head #101)
Patsy - JY 166 (JY Head #102)
Ingrid - JY 166 (SM Head #76)
Monique - JY 165SR (JY Head #134)
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
Well that's certainly the line WM would take, although the "weight penalty" never seems to be an issue when they want bigger hips and boobs...WM174G or WM158G for example.PDutus wrote:Indeed so, but they are unlikely to give her a thicker waist due to the weight penalty.nicvncnt wrote:Smaller boobs, thicker waist.
- WM Dolls News
- Manufacturer Affiliated
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 5:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: THE WM FILES n°29: New WM175D reaches new heights!
It seems smaller breasts wins. So smaller breasts it will be.
We listened to you in anticipation.
Ted