A CLOSER look at the WM 166 C
- Booty Call Dolls
- VENDOR
- Posts: 24034
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:49 pm
- Contact:
-
- Doll Patriarch
- Posts: 4464
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2015 5:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: A CLOSER look at the WM 166 C
Can't even place nipples correctly ?
What a shame, doll could've been so much better by simply getting the nipples right.
Jelina and Jelena 170cm C slim body twins.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DL2 Fashion Studio
viewtopic.php?t=116236
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Olinka YL170 D
viewtopic.php?t=93693
- Alucard1959
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 3:08 pm
- Location: The NorthEast
- Contact:
Re: A CLOSER look at the WM 166 C
"Atlanta Rythum Section"
-
- Active Member
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2020 12:43 am
- Location: Montreal Canada
- Contact:
Re: A CLOSER look at the WM 166 C
- Booty Call Dolls
- VENDOR
- Posts: 24034
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: A CLOSER look at the WM 166 C
Please see the black lines I added.
Look at her collar bone angle please.
If you drew a line there as well as from one nipple to the other, the lines would be parallel.
The dolls areolas are just fine.
I had factory photos arrive and areolas did not look even on a WM 172B
This is once in over 700 dolls so pretty rare, right?
After going back and forth with WM, Jack checked the doll at the factory himself and realized it was the shoulders.
They were not aligned.
Take a doll, shrugg one shoulder up, the other down.
Guess what happens?
V/r
Jeff
PS-WM is NOT messing up alot!
- Attachments
-
- 20220606_152955.jpg (101.44 KiB) Viewed 3477 times
- Booty Call Dolls
- VENDOR
- Posts: 24034
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:49 pm
- Contact:
- Booty Call Dolls
- VENDOR
- Posts: 24034
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: A CLOSER look at the WM 166 C
Please see below and you can judge for yourself.
viewtopic.php?p=2134692&hilit=wm+166c#p2134692
viewtopic.php?p=2109199&hilit=wm+166c#p2109199
- Booty Call Dolls
- VENDOR
- Posts: 24034
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: A CLOSER look at the WM 166 C
I mean, with a view like this, what more needs to be said?