Real Lady 170 doll Tale of the Tape.

Panther68 · Post by **Panther68** » Wed Sep 06, 2023 10:51 am

4891d wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 8:58 am
As for the silhouette, this new doll seems to me between those of the 166 and the 168, two very beautiful dolls too.
As you have a 166 doll, occasionally it would be interesting to have side by side photos with this 170 cm doll to really see the differences. According to what you and Samurai measured, the 166 cm weighs about 10 kg less than this 170 cm, if I remember correctly (measured lighter than what IT advertises). Looking at the photos separately I do feel a difference in volume, but not as clear as the difference in weight would suggest. With side-by-side photos, I would probably better understand where these kg are located.

Morning 4891d,

She actually reminds me of my Irontech 168 TPE doll from 2018, Ayumi.

: IMG_20220831_161139184_HDR.jpg (813.24 KiB) Viewed 1500 times

You are right about the IT 166. Actually, an 12kg difference. Since they are currently only about 5 feet apart, right now. I can pair them up for some side by side comparisons.

: IMG_20230902_171458347_HDR.jpg (1.02 MiB) Viewed 1500 times

bwll001 · Post by **bwll001** » Wed Sep 06, 2023 11:36 am

May I ask what softness did you choose for your doll

Panther68 · Post by **Panther68** » Wed Sep 06, 2023 12:09 pm

bwll001 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 11:36 am May I ask what softness did you choose for your doll

I chose their standard silicone for a couple of reasons. My dolls travel with me doing outdoor photography and can get easily damaged from falling and I requested hard silicone for hands and feet, so the transition from ultra soft silicone to hard silicone will create seam lines as stated by Irontech. The doll does have gel breasts and butt.

Panther68 · Post by **Panther68** » Sun Sep 10, 2023 9:03 am

4891d wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 8:58 am
As for the silhouette, this new doll seems to me between those of the 166 and the 168, two very beautiful dolls too.
As you have a 166 doll, occasionally it would be interesting to have side by side photos with this 170 cm doll to really see the differences. According to what you and Samurai measured, the 166 cm weighs about 10 kg less than this 170 cm, if I remember correctly (measured lighter than what IT advertises). Looking at the photos separately I do feel a difference in volume, but not as clear as the difference in weight would suggest. With side-by-side photos, I would probably better understand where these kg are located.

This is for you, 4891d Took some photos of the Real Lady and IT 166 Side by Side along with a quick video.

Weight difference is 12kg The most obvious differences Shoulders 34cm vs 40cm, waist 58cm vs 63cm, under bust 64cm vs 72cm, hips 91cm vs 101cm

4891d · Post by **4891d** » Sun Sep 10, 2023 11:34 am

Panther68 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 9:03 am
This is for you, 4891d Took some photos of the Real Lady and IT 166 Side by Side along with a quick video.

Weight difference is 12kg The most obvious differences Shoulders 34cm vs 40cm, waist 58cm vs 53cm, under bust 64cm vs 72cm, hips 91cm vs 101cm

Thank you Panther!

The 166 cm body is well shaped and I don't feel too much the fact that it is significantly thinner. The most visible difference is in the width of the shoulders; if the 166 body had slightly wider shoulders (36 to 38 cm) it would be ideal.
The 170 cm body goes even further in realism and it is very successful... but 12 kg more!... We arrive at a weight that I could no longer handle.

I hope IT updates the panoramic photo where they show all the bodies at the same scale. I would like to see the new 169 cm (advertised at 30 or 32 kg depending on the sellers), the 163 cm (advertised at 36.5 kg) and the 170 alongside the other very realistic bodies.
In less than two years, IT has built quite a range of silicone bodies! Impressive!

Monique73 · Post by **Monique73** » Sun Sep 10, 2023 12:18 pm

Die Details der Haut sind wirklich sehr beeindruckend. Wahnsinn! Ein wunderschönes Mädel!

Corpius · Post by **Corpius** » Sun Sep 10, 2023 6:03 pm

Panther68 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 9:03 am
4891d wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 8:58 am
As for the silhouette, this new doll seems to me between those of the 166 and the 168, two very beautiful dolls too.
As you have a 166 doll, occasionally it would be interesting to have side by side photos with this 170 cm doll to really see the differences. According to what you and Samurai measured, the 166 cm weighs about 10 kg less than this 170 cm, if I remember correctly (measured lighter than what IT advertises). Looking at the photos separately I do feel a difference in volume, but not as clear as the difference in weight would suggest. With side-by-side photos, I would probably better understand where these kg are located.

This is for you, 4891d Took some photos of the Real Lady and IT 166 Side by Side along with a quick video.

Weight difference is 12kg The most obvious differences Shoulders 34cm vs 40cm, waist 58cm vs 63cm, under bust 64cm vs 72cm, hips 91cm vs 101cm

Great poses. How do you manage to pose them so well without them falling over?!?!

Musiclover · Post by **Musiclover** » Mon Sep 11, 2023 1:31 am

Great comparison between models

SkyWalker206 · Post by **SkyWalker206** » Tue Sep 12, 2023 11:57 pm

great reviews, thanks!

msd1985 · Post by **msd1985** » Wed Sep 13, 2023 9:02 am

wow!!

How many dolls do you actually own?

knallhatten · Post by **knallhatten** » Wed Sep 13, 2023 9:25 am

Panther 68 , absolutely awesome photos even if they are not arranged in a perfect studio milieu ! That is real craftsmanship

Tomiko Doll · Post by **Tomiko Doll** » Wed Sep 20, 2023 3:02 am

I have really beautiful girls and put them in tens

Panther68 · Post by **Panther68** » Wed Sep 20, 2023 8:47 am

Musiclover wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 1:31 am Great comparison between models

Thanks Musiclover

SkyWalker206 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 12, 2023 11:57 pm great reviews, thanks!

You're welcome SkyWalker

msd1985 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 9:02 am wow!!
How many dolls do you actually own?

Too many, 31 dolls and 56 heads.

knallhatten wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 9:25 am Panther 68 , absolutely awesome photos even if they are not arranged in a perfect studio milieu ! That is real craftsmanship

Thanks knallhatten. So what is a studio miieu? I am not up on photography jargon.

Tomiko Doll wrote: ↑Wed Sep 20, 2023 3:02 am I have really beautiful girls and put them in tens

Thanks Tomiko Doll

Panther68 · Post by **Panther68** » Wed Sep 20, 2023 10:54 am

A behind the scene photo of Mishka and I's photo session of our Real Lady 170 dolls. One can see the difference between the dark tan tone and the fair tone skin.

4891d · Post by **4891d** » Wed Sep 20, 2023 1:42 pm

There is quite a difference. In natural lighting, the fair tone is really very pale.
Your 166 cm Céline doll is light tan, right?
Do you have problems with paint being erased by abrasion? This is a problem that seems to be recurring with many silicone dolls, but some brands seem less affected than others. What about your ITs, who are big travelers and put on and take off a lot of clothes?