Your Feedback Wanted! New body shape just for you

[Babel99]

the predominance of overweight, or "thick" women in the West is an aberration and not necessarily reflective of human nature or human desires.

"Thick" women have been celebrated and desired for a very very long time... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Willendorf

venus_willendorf.jpg (81.92 KiB) Viewed 768 times

Yikes!!! We see the evolution of sex dolls right here

-

[DollCommander]

It's actually more realistic and natural to be attracted to this:


than to this:

Thousands of years of human history disagrees. Modern science only relatively recently makes it possible for women without optimal body types to support (supplemental nutrition), birth (C section), and sustain (synthetically produced formula) human children.

There is a huge difference between thick and healthy and overweight with unhealthy amounts of excessive fat.

This girl is not overweight or fat, but I bet she is fertile as can be and can support a healthy child (aka the purpose of human life)

* She also has almost 2 million followers on twitter alone and is a star in Asia *

her-chun-li-makes-me-crazy-v0-wqilabhw465c1-3255758564.jpg (282.42 KiB) Viewed 747 times

She is cosplaying one of , if not the most popular and recognizable female video game characters of all time world wide, who is also not stick thin or flat chested..

th-1272044476.jpg (32.5 KiB) Viewed 736 times

[DocWen]

I have to admit that for ME that the most important aspect of this body would be the height and weight. After having experienced a properly weight reduced doll, it’s just too darn important to me.

However I’m also very sure that TAYU will figure that out!

[tryingthegames]

Looks really good. Only thing I would change is that the legs are way too long, as others have mentioned.

[lightfootted]

Hi Tayu, my feedback:

-Slightly shorter legs, slightly longer torso
-Slightly smaller breasts OR slightly larger breasts, pick a direction (I prefer smaller)
-Less stomach bulge
-Slightly wider torso
-Keep leg, hip, and butt design the same, great work there
-Less than 30kg weight
-157-165cm height

An observation for other posters: this thread is for feedback on the proposed doll design. At least half of the responses are off topic and some break the rules by discussing other manufacturers.

[claydough]

I really don't like the characterization of skinny-waisted girls with wide hips / a nice ass as "unrealistic", or any kind of thin, athletic girl as "unrealistic".

I think what people in the West need to realize is that heavy, or chubby women are abnormal in most of the world, and the predominance of overweight, or "thick" women in the West is an aberration and not necessarily reflective of human nature or human desires.

It's actually more realistic and natural to be attracted to this:

katherine-webb-in-bikini-at-encore-beach-club-pool-in-vegas-2072118142-1531224247.jpg

than to this:

86be279c6e9235719ecd8ecf826880cb.jpg


The first is a thin, healthy, athletic young woman, and the latter is a woman who is overweight and unhealthy.

If you travel the world, you will see far more thin, athletic women than "thick" women, especially in countries where the Western diet hasn't taken 100% hold and people still walk places instead of driving everywhere in a car.

he says as he quotes the asian model in the asian market

not sure why this is getting political, this is all about peoples preferences and bringing to market alternate bodies for those who want different bodies

weather you call skinny 'normal' or call thick 'fat' is really beside the point, people wanna make an issue of east vs west and all it is is individual preferences

[crabstacean]

Now it turns out that thin, healthy, fit women cannot give birth naturally. What a bunch of bullcrap. There is a difference between body proportions (genetics) and body fat (discipline).

Eating more and getting fat does not make your hip bones grow, nor your mammary glands bigger. Jesus, this is anatomy 101.

Fat women were praised in the past because they were simply rare and exotic, since food was mostly scarce. It has nothing to do with child-bearing nor health. In fact, the more overweight; the more complications during birth.

[Babel99]

Now it turns out that thin, healthy, fit women cannot give birth naturally. What a bunch of bullcrap. There is a difference between body proportions (genetics) and body fat (discipline).

Eating more and getting fat does not make your hip bones grow, nor your mammary glands bigger. Jesus, this is anatomy 101.

Fat women were praised in the past because they were simply rare and exotic, since food was mostly scarce. It has nothing to do with child-bearing nor health. In fact, the more overweight; the more complications during birth.

I saw a very good documentary few years back named "Science of Sex" where they studied tons of different cultures over the history of few centuries. The conclusion was awesome. Different cultures appreciated different women figures, however one thing was common for them all. They all were attracted by the "hourglass figure of a woman", briefly some cultures like thinner women like other like bigger one, but the hourglass figure is important (bigger breast and hip, while the waist is smaller than the hip). For a human, this is sign of health, which is specifically programmed in our brains to be attracted too. Fat women, who lose the hourglass figure are a niche, and are not proclaimed as sexy in any cultures. Few painters and sculptors did represented fat women, but it does not mean that it was the culture consensus as attractive. This is a little bit like today where fat women are shown on the cover of Sport Illustrated as "sexy" ... but that 99% of men will not give a damn about it.

[ZZ48UUP]

Deanna Ritter Clone. I would buy it instantly

[bl8900]

the predominance of overweight, or "thick" women in the West is an aberration and not necessarily reflective of human nature or human desires.

"Thick" women have been celebrated and desired for a very very long time... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Willendorf

From the wiki itself:

Very little is known about the Venus' origin, method of creation, or cultural significance; however, it is one of numerous "Venus figurines" surviving from Paleolithic Europe.[10] The purpose of the carving is the subject of much speculation.

I strongly disagree with your statement, as that is your interpretation. Its meaning was lost ~25,000 years ago per the article. It could have been a warning against people like Gorlock the destroyer (google him - yes him) for all anyone knows. I am against that shape for various reasons like weight, not my thing nor preference, and innately against it.


As for the topic on hand, I'd like to see a G-cup model ~160 to 170cm under 34kg (lower the better) like this AI generated model:


The leg length ratios for the 148 and 161 seem fine for me.

Edit:
I own models 148cm D+ cup and 161cm F cup. From experience, I would like to see improvements in the vagina texture. The 161cm model was certainly a step up from the 148cm model but still feels lacking. Their are a couple of other manufactures that have a few other love hole texture options and would be a great option to have.

[DollCommander]

Now it turns out that thin, healthy, fit women cannot give birth naturally. What a bunch of bullcrap. There is a difference between body proportions (genetics) and body fat (discipline).

Eating more and getting fat does not make your hip bones grow, nor your mammary glands bigger. Jesus, this is anatomy 101.

Fat women were praised in the past because they were simply rare and exotic, since food was mostly scarce. It has nothing to do with child-bearing nor health. In fact, the more overweight; the more complications during birth.

This doll is fat/obese..not what people here are asking for

starpery_161cm_ursula_-_real_bbw_siliconetpe_sex_doll_1_~2.jpg (61.15 KiB) Viewed 432 times

This is Tayu's current recipe..extremely unbelievably thin arms, legs, bodies (depth) with disproportionately large head (one of the main ways they achieve low weight).

Disproportionately large head

158cm-C-Cup-Head7-Ivy-Scaled-Down-Set1-20.jpg (142.61 KiB) Viewed 432 times

Disproportionately large head

Screenshot_20240311-191728~2.png (206.74 KiB) Viewed 432 times

Legs effectively crossed but thighs do not touch, leaving bow legged "horse rider" gap.

file-149.jpg (107.69 KiB) Viewed 432 times

Knees touching but has the "horse rider" gap between the thighs due to thigh thickness (or lack of) compared to hip width.

file-150.jpg (151.81 KiB) Viewed 432 times

Again, not what people here are asking for and either is Tayu. Tayu is looking for feedback on a body that is not stick thin like the rest of their catalog and the hundreds of other stick thin options from nearly every silicone manufacturer.

[DollCommander]

the predominance of overweight, or "thick" women in the West is an aberration and not necessarily reflective of human nature or human desires.

"Thick" women have been celebrated and desired for a very very long time... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Willendorf

From the wiki itself:

Very little is known about the Venus' origin, method of creation, or cultural significance; however, it is one of numerous "Venus figurines" surviving from Paleolithic Europe.[10] The purpose of the carving is the subject of much speculation.

I strongly disagree with your statement, as that is your interpretation. Its meaning was lost ~25,000 years ago per the article. It could have been a warning against people like Gorlock the destroyer (google him - yes him) for all anyone knows. I am against that shape for various reasons like weight, not my thing nor preference, and innately against it.


As for the topic on hand, I'd like to see a G-cup model ~160 to 170cm under 34kg (lower the better) like this AI generated model:


The leg length ratios for the 148 and 161 seem fine for me.

Edit:
I own models 148cm D+ cup and 161cm F cup. From experience, I would like to see improvements in the vagina texture. The 161cm model was certainly a step up from the 148cm model but still feels lacking. Their are a couple of other manufactures that have a few other love hole texture options and would be a great option to have.

Don't forget wiki can be written and/or edited by anyone.

Breasts look good on all of those AI photos but none of the bodies fit with Tayu's request for a "plump" (aka thicker than stick thin, not fat or obese) model. Except breast size they all pretty much look like Tayu's already existing catalog.

[bl8900]

the predominance of overweight, or "thick" women in the West is an aberration and not necessarily reflective of human nature or human desires.

"Thick" women have been celebrated and desired for a very very long time... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Willendorf

From the wiki itself:

Very little is known about the Venus' origin, method of creation, or cultural significance; however, it is one of numerous "Venus figurines" surviving from Paleolithic Europe.[10] The purpose of the carving is the subject of much speculation.

I strongly disagree with your statement, as that is your interpretation. Its meaning was lost ~25,000 years ago per the article. It could have been a warning against people like Gorlock the destroyer (google him - yes him) for all anyone knows. I am against that shape for various reasons like weight, not my thing nor preference, and innately against it.


As for the topic on hand, I'd like to see a G-cup model ~160 to 170cm under 34kg (lower the better) like this AI generated model:(see original post, links removed for brevity)
The leg length ratios for the 148 and 161 seem fine for me.

Edit:
I own models 148cm D+ cup and 161cm F cup. From experience, I would like to see improvements in the vagina texture. The 161cm model was certainly a step up from the 148cm model but still feels lacking. Their are a couple of other manufactures that have a few other love hole texture options and would be a great option to have.

Don't forget wiki can be written and/or edited by anyone.

Breasts look good on all of those AI photos but none of the bodies fit with Tayu's request for a "plump" (aka thicker than stick thin, not fat or obese) model. Except breast size they all pretty much look like Tayu's already existing catalog.

Yes, the wiki can be edited and the sources can potentially be biased as well. The statue is still subject to infinite interpretation is my point. The statement of

"Thick" women have been celebrated and desired for a very very long time...

does not hold true for all and is subjective at best. It may hold true for a certain culture at a certain point in time. By the same token, some culture at a certain point in time would find it grotesque as well. The statues shape is certainly not the shape of the average woman in history and only in country's like the US is this a recent thing.

I disagree with the body statements where the AI pics look like the existing catalog. I have a couple Tayu's and having them for a couple of years and you will notice the differences comparing to the AI pic's. The AI pics have more a defined stomach/torso area, shoulder width is a bit longer, the under bust measure is a bit larger, "hour glass" shape is more pronounced, thigh to calf ratio is more meaty on the thighs, calves appear bigger.

I'm not sure if they have fixed the wrists twisting the silicone when rotating, but I'd like to see that addressed at some point.

[DollCommander]

the predominance of overweight, or "thick" women in the West is an aberration and not necessarily reflective of human nature or human desires.

"Thick" women have been celebrated and desired for a very very long time... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Willendorf

From the wiki itself:

Very little is known about the Venus' origin, method of creation, or cultural significance; however, it is one of numerous "Venus figurines" surviving from Paleolithic Europe.[10] The purpose of the carving is the subject of much speculation.

I strongly disagree with your statement, as that is your interpretation. Its meaning was lost ~25,000 years ago per the article. It could have been a warning against people like Gorlock the destroyer (google him - yes him) for all anyone knows. I am against that shape for various reasons like weight, not my thing nor preference, and innately against it.


As for the topic on hand, I'd like to see a G-cup model ~160 to 170cm under 34kg (lower the better) like this AI generated model:(see original post, links removed for brevity)
The leg length ratios for the 148 and 161 seem fine for me.

Edit:
I own models 148cm D+ cup and 161cm F cup. From experience, I would like to see improvements in the vagina texture. The 161cm model was certainly a step up from the 148cm model but still feels lacking. Their are a couple of other manufactures that have a few other love hole texture options and would be a great option to have.

Don't forget wiki can be written and/or edited by anyone.

Breasts look good on all of those AI photos but none of the bodies fit with Tayu's request for a "plump" (aka thicker than stick thin, not fat or obese) model. Except breast size they all pretty much look like Tayu's already existing catalog.

Yes, the wiki can be edited and the sources can potentially be biased as well. The statue is still subject to infinite interpretation is my point. The statement of

"Thick" women have been celebrated and desired for a very very long time...

does not hold true for all and is subjective at best. It may hold true for a certain culture at a certain point in time. By the same token, some culture at a certain point in time would find it grotesque as well. The statues shape is certainly not the shape of the average woman in history and only in country's like the US is this a recent thing.

I disagree with the body statements where the AI pics look like the existing catalog. I have a couple Tayu's and having them for a couple of years and you will notice the differences comparing to the AI pic's. The AI pics have more a defined stomach/torso area, shoulder width is a bit longer, the under bust measure is a bit larger, "hour glass" shape is more pronounced, thigh to calf ratio is more meaty on the thighs, calves appear bigger.

Yeah, I think there is some confusion between thick and actually fat or obese.

Thick imo is shapely but healthy, medium to large breast, prominent hips, meaty ass and thighs. And this is what I imagine Tayu is asking for when they are looking for guidance on a "plump" (Tayu's words) model. Like this..

Upper mid to large breast, meaty thighs, prominent hips, no fat/cellulite. Neither one of these girls are fat or obese.

th-391960998.jpg (74.81 KiB) Viewed 381 times

Screenshot_20240311-215304~2.png (448.94 KiB) Viewed 381 times

Screenshot_20240311-215425~2.png (513.61 KiB) Viewed 381 times

Fat or obese is the unhealthy, huge belly, cellulite cottage cheese ass and thighs look. Like this..

Screenshot_20240311-215603~2.png (786.38 KiB) Viewed 381 times

I'm not sure if they have fixed the wrists twisting the silicone when rotating, but I'd like to see that addressed at some point.

Supposedly they did.

[horrorhorry]

Hi Tayu !

I like it! her back looks great, on the front I like to see some bits tweaked and the overall torso longer and legs shorter

Maybe some more muscle tone ? more of a fit body ?
I love more of a fitness model type shape.
A sexy body like cammy from streetfighter
.

concept.png (1.48 MiB) Viewed 372 times

.
.

So I did some more abs , more leg muscle not too extreme though .. tweaked the arms and shoulders .. upper body from her torso is a bit wider, gave her more sculpted waist, and a tiny bit more hips ... and made her torso longer so the legs don't look weirdly long ...hmm I think that's all.

O and height hmm.. between 160 / 168 something like that ?

let me know your thoughts.