www.irontechdoll.com

Can't Decide Between IT160 Silicone, IT162 Silicone, or IT163+

Irontech Doll brand, is owned and operated by Shenzhen Iron Technology Co.,Ltd. Various new designs and updates on craftsmanship arise here all the time. We keep improving on the design, doll craftsmanship and other details. We know that only great work can meet the customers' demand for beauty.
Website: www.irontechdoll.com
Commish
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 251
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2023 1:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Can't Decide Between IT160 Silicone, IT162 Silicone, or IT163+

Post by Commish »

I hope you’re looking at the weight of these dolls as well!

User avatar
mebaru
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2023 11:32 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Can't Decide Between IT160 Silicone, IT162 Silicone, or IT163+

Post by mebaru »

You joined TDF three years before me, and this is your first time buying a doll?
My gal
Irontech 163plus-G TPE Sandra#35 Sarah#67

User avatar
SkyWalker206
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: Can't Decide Between IT160 Silicone, IT162 Silicone, or IT163+

Post by SkyWalker206 »

I vote 163. It has 50/50 head to torso ratios.
The only concern for me is that she has smaller breasts.

Jrizzblue1441
Contributing Poster
Contributing Poster
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 1:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Can't Decide Between IT160 Silicone, IT162 Silicone, or IT163+

Post by Jrizzblue1441 »

Yes the reallady 160 they should only focus on making the butt more bigger but not like the original 160 they're going to make this one more curvy and make the butt looks more like a candid type and make it stick out more like a heart shape the boobs supposedly they should make it smaller because it makes the body looks more complicated especially when it comes to the weight I told Matt to make this 160 looks more like a like for example you see how the 161 and the 160 TPE version iorntech doll how it looks like right it's going to look similar the same way between together but better in both ways mix together that's what you have to understand they have to take their time with this mold on this 160 body the right way enough to make it look right they're not trying to make this one heavy like the original one they trying to make it lighter and see this is my opinion why I'm getting the 160cm because of a real reason I don't just get anybody I just only get a body that matches my height I'm only 5 ft 7 1/2 and it matches my height you know what I'm saying what I'm going to do a demonstration with you real quick.
Attachments
Screenshot_20240515-155905.png
Screenshot_20240515-155905.png (1.78 MiB) Viewed 598 times
Screenshot_20240515-160305.png
Screenshot_20240515-160305.png (1.46 MiB) Viewed 598 times

Jrizzblue1441
Contributing Poster
Contributing Poster
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 1:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Can't Decide Between IT160 Silicone, IT162 Silicone, or IT163+

Post by Jrizzblue1441 »

Now if you see a picture with cardi b that I just sent just a few minutes ago that's a demonstration of how a 160 reallady should look like when it develops and sometimes in August but they're going to announce it sometimes either next month or July just stay tuned.

Jrizzblue1441
Contributing Poster
Contributing Poster
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 1:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Can't Decide Between IT160 Silicone, IT162 Silicone, or IT163+

Post by Jrizzblue1441 »

They also have other reallady bodies they releasing out too not just the 160cm they releasing like five different bodies at the same time.

User avatar
Babel99
Doll Elder
Doll Elder
Posts: 2578
Joined: Wed May 11, 2016 8:38 am
Contact:

Re: Can't Decide Between IT160 Silicone, IT162 Silicone, or IT163+

Post by Babel99 »

CONEBONE07 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 3:06 pm A few images of what I'm looking for exactly
Look at Brooke in my signature. She is not IT but has the general shape what you are looking for.
***
Jael - (YL 148) viewtopic.php?f=212&t=73333

Miriame - (SM 136) viewtopic.php?f=269&t=102115

Beth - (SM 157G) viewtopic.php?f=269&t=149637

Brooke - (Starpery 148F) viewtopic.php?t=175783

***

User avatar
Lazlo12
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun May 19, 2024 7:48 am
Contact:

Re: Can't Decide Between IT160 Silicone, IT162 Silicone, or IT163+

Post by Lazlo12 »

Hello everyone for a new real lady why not ask the actress Angela White she is exactly 160cm and has perfect and realistic shapes if they do I buy it directly :D

Image

CONEBONE07
Active Poster
Active Poster
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2020 1:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Can't Decide Between IT160 Silicone, IT162 Silicone, or IT163+

Post by CONEBONE07 »

Hmmm, Cardi B's body shape doesn't do it for me, I do think the 163+ resembles most what I'm looking for. But, Damn! Babel99's Brooke is quite a sight too. Wow! That one has now just joined the list. Short though at 4'10". Too many options, makes a man's head convoluted.

User avatar
mebaru
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2023 11:32 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Can't Decide Between IT160 Silicone, IT162 Silicone, or IT163+

Post by mebaru »

CONEBONE07 wrote: Sun May 12, 2024 2:44 pm I go back and forth. These 3 are very similar. And personally, I'd like to purchase once and have that be the end of it...
The world doesn't always work out that way.
Perhaps you will not be satisfied with any of these three choices.
I have a 163plus, which is older than the other two silicone dolls.
It was a hot topic when it was first released, but now the concept seems a bit old-fashioned and the LHP is not that good (especially the position of the anus).
You've made a CG of your ideal woman, but you seem to like chubby women, and so do I.
But 163plus is not a chubby doll, and while it may seem that way because of her large boobs, she clearly does not have a chubby style.
My gal
Irontech 163plus-G TPE Sandra#35 Sarah#67

User avatar
SCjutsu0
Basic Poster
Basic Poster
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2023 7:11 am
Contact:

Re: Can't Decide Between IT160 Silicone, IT162 Silicone, or IT163+

Post by SCjutsu0 »

Jrizzblue1441 wrote: Sat May 18, 2024 4:55 am Yes the reallady 160 they should only focus on making the butt more bigger but not like the original 160 they're going to make this one more curvy and make the butt looks more like a candid type and make it stick out more like a heart shape the boobs supposedly they should make it smaller because it makes the body looks more complicated especially when it comes to the weight I told Matt to make this 160 looks more like a like for example you see how the 161 and the 160 TPE version iorntech doll how it looks like right it's going to look similar the same way between together but better in both ways mix together that's what you have to understand they have to take their time with this mold on this 160 body the right way enough to make it look right they're not trying to make this one heavy like the original one they trying to make it lighter and see this is my opinion why I'm getting the 160cm because of a real reason I don't just get anybody I just only get a body that matches my height I'm only 5 ft 7 1/2 and it matches my height you know what I'm saying what I'm going to do a demonstration with you real quick.

Sure, since all doll manufacturers use the same cast iron mold, some one should ask irontech directly to make a silicone copy of that type doll

https://www.rosemarydoll.com/product/15 ... oll-madge/

I don’t know if it could work Starpery does it why can’t irontech
Attachments
156cm5ft1-H-cup-TPE-Sex-Doll-–-Madge-31-1.jpg
156cm5ft1-H-cup-TPE-Sex-Doll-–-Madge-31-1.jpg (123.02 KiB) Viewed 514 times

Post Reply

INFORMATIONS