IT168cm LHP

curious_person · Post by **curious_person** » Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:08 am

Getting here from another thread listing "dolls with good LHP", I have become interested in the IronTech 168cm (C-cup?)
could anyone confirm or deny that it's LHP is suitable for doggystyle? (e.g. naturally without needing extreme back arch)
My reference point in doll experience is my WM172D which I recently acquired. Amazing bodyshape IMO, great for many uses, but poor LHP prevents it being a straight 10/10 across the board.

Some photos certainly seem to look more anatomically realistic (detailing and placement)

http://www.irontechdoll.com/product/168 ... l-451.html

I notice on the site there is a standard (38kg) and 'plump' (40kg)version, it's the standard that interests me. Is the LHP the same on both?

I know what I'm in for with the weight, as my existing doll is also 38kg.

thanks for any opinions or advice

I had also been considering the HR165/166 for similar reasons

sexdoll4649sexdoll · Post by **sexdoll4649sexdoll** » Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:50 am

Search for IRONTECH 168 CM on pornhub.
Looking at the video, it seems that there is no problem because the legs are standing upright and they mate like dogs.

Ask Iron Tech's Mike and you'll see a variety of photos, including the factory.
He is sincere with his customers.

sexdoll4649sexdoll · Post by **sexdoll4649sexdoll** » Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:58 am

IRONTECH 168CM JELINA HAS TIGHT PUSSY
Search like this.
Your anxiety will disappear.

curious_person · Post by **curious_person** » Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:10 am

sexdoll4649sexdoll wrote:Search for IRONTECH 168 CM on pornhub.
Looking at the video, it seems that there is no problem because the legs are standing upright and they mate like dogs.

Ask Iron Tech's Mike and you'll see a variety of photos, including the factory.
He is sincere with his customers.

thanks the reference material is helpful, it does indeed look impressive. yes, her legs are straight and her back is more natural!

Next question , can you confirm if choosing an insert (vs fixed) would maintain the same LHP? (the material might stretch differently in that area on bending the limbs)

by default I would choose fixed, but if an insert does not compromise this , I might be interested in that option.

also in "IRONTECH 168CM DOGGIE STYLE" etc .. do you know which face that is (with the dark wig)? in the videos he calls her "jelina" but I can't seem to find a jelina head, that might just be his personal name.

sexdoll4649sexdoll · Post by **sexdoll4649sexdoll** » Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:39 am

Please listen to the IT microphone for more information.
I have never been disappointed in consulting him.
Tell the customer in good faith. He doesn't hide any bad things.
He's not a sly salesman who only tells you the strong points and hides his flaws.
He will also hear, understand and shape all your questions and needs.
sales06@irontechdoll.com

dollfactory · Post by **dollfactory** » Wed Sep 02, 2020 9:50 pm

curious_person wrote:Getting here from another thread listing "dolls with good LHP", I have become interested in the IronTech 168cm (C-cup?)
could anyone confirm or deny that it's LHP is suitable for doggystyle? (e.g. naturally without needing extreme back arch)
My reference point in doll experience is my WM172D which I recently acquired. Amazing bodyshape IMO, great for many uses, but poor LHP prevents it being a straight 10/10 across the board.

Some photos certainly seem to look more anatomically realistic (detailing and placement)

http://www.irontechdoll.com/product/168 ... l-451.html

I notice on the site there is a standard (38kg) and 'plump' (40kg)version, it's the standard that interests me. Is the LHP the same on both?

I know what I'm in for with the weight, as my existing doll is also 38kg.

thanks for any opinions or advice

I had also been considering the HR165/166 for similar reasons

Hi curious_person,

The LHP is the same on both, They are all designed according to the most real position of the human body.
Please check the pics of IT168cm, also please send me the picture of jelina head, I will let you know which head is it.

Best regards
Mike

dollfactory · Post by **dollfactory** » Wed Sep 02, 2020 9:52 pm

sexdoll4649sexdoll wrote:Please listen to the IT microphone for more information.
I have never been disappointed in consulting him.
Tell the customer in good faith. He doesn't hide any bad things.
He's not a sly salesman who only tells you the strong points and hides his flaws.
He will also hear, understand and shape all your questions and needs.
sales06@irontechdoll.com

Thanks F K,

dollfactory · Post by **dollfactory** » Wed Sep 02, 2020 11:13 pm

curious_person wrote:
sexdoll4649sexdoll wrote:Search for IRONTECH 168 CM on pornhub.
Looking at the video, it seems that there is no problem because the legs are standing upright and they mate like dogs.

Ask Iron Tech's Mike and you'll see a variety of photos, including the factory.
He is sincere with his customers.
thanks the reference material is helpful, it does indeed look impressive. yes, her legs are straight and her back is more natural!

Next question , can you confirm if choosing an insert (vs fixed) would maintain the same LHP? (the material might stretch differently in that area on bending the limbs)

by default I would choose fixed, but if an insert does not compromise this , I might be interested in that option.

also in "IRONTECH 168CM DOGGIE STYLE" etc .. do you know which face that is (with the dark wig)? in the videos he calls her "jelina" but I can't seem to find a jelina head, that might just be his personal name.

The insert and fixed would maintain the same LHP, insert vagina does not compromise when you bending the limbs.
The advantage of the replaceable vagina is that it is more convenient for you to clean after using the doll.

Johndoe2020 · Post by **Johndoe2020** » Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:57 am

pretty sure the standard is a D-Cup model, not a C cup.

curious_person · Post by **curious_person** » Thu Sep 03, 2020 4:43 am

dollfactory wrote: The LHP is the same on both, They are all designed according to the most real position of the human body.
Please check the pics of IT168cm, also please send me the picture of jelina head, I will let you know which head is it.

Best regards
Mike

Thanks, thats awesome, those images are very clear and very impressive

dollfactory · Post by **dollfactory** » Thu Sep 03, 2020 5:05 am

curious_person wrote:
dollfactory wrote: The LHP is the same on both, They are all designed according to the most real position of the human body.
Please check the pics of IT168cm, also please send me the picture of jelina head, I will let you know which head is it.

Best regards
Mike
Thanks, thats awesome, those images are very clear and very impressive

Any requirements or questions please feel free to contact me by Email.
sales06@irontechdoll.com