Irontech LHP

a8411 · Post by **a8411** » Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:03 pm

So I should be getting a new TPE doll from Irontech in the near future but need help on deciding on one that works for me. I've been eye balling the 158 but have seen both positive and negative comments on the 158 LHP. I currently own a silicone 162 and I am completely fine with the placement of the holes but maybe I might be missing out on something since that is the only doll I have owned. The second runner up would be the 164.

Basically, my "works with me" thing is a decent booty. The bigger the better imo.

goodfruits · Post by **goodfruits** » Mon Feb 14, 2022 12:12 pm

158 weights 112 pounds and puts a lot of pressure on the skeleton. 164 or 161 if it was me. (i have a 158). beautiful but the weight seems to cause trouble for the skeleton

Naz34 · Post by **Naz34** » Mon Feb 14, 2022 5:41 pm

If you only have her lying in bed, then take the doll whose shape you like.
If you plan to take photos or experiment with poses, consider the weight.
I thought for a long time and in the end, because of the weight, I took a doll with a height of 154 tpe, although 164 tpe attracted.

a8411 · Post by **a8411** » Wed Feb 16, 2022 12:04 am

Ill probably just go with the 158. From my experience with my doll, the weight makes it harder to position and pose for use but I noticed that as the joints have loosened up a bit, my ability to pose the doll has gotten much easier.

Davoman123 · Post by **Davoman123** » Fri Mar 04, 2022 5:25 am

I’m also interested in finding out more info on the LHP of the Irontech 158 from those who own the doll. I’ve heard mixed things as well, some say it’s not great but you can make doggie work, others say it’s just bad. So it’s hard to come to a conclusion.

Irontechdoll Office · Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:20 pm

158cm doll in doggy style

Nectar · Post by **Nectar** » Wed Mar 09, 2022 10:42 pm

That LHP looks frustrating

esquisseallure · Post by **esquisseallure** » Thu Mar 10, 2022 4:30 am

Nectar wrote:That LHP looks frustrating

LOL. Irontech typically avoid advertising their placements. I rarely trust irontech to even attempt to create a suitable LHP. I'd put irontech on the below average score for LHP.

Aeron · Post by **Aeron** » Fri Mar 11, 2022 7:12 pm

esquisseallure wrote:
Nectar wrote:That LHP looks frustrating
LOL. Irontech typically avoid advertising their placements. I rarely trust irontech to even attempt to create a suitable LHP. I'd put irontech on the below average score for LHP.

What about their silicon 166? Looks like a huge improvement in comparison to the image above.

viewtopic.php?f=388&t=151243

a8411 · Post by **a8411** » Fri Mar 11, 2022 7:27 pm

Aeron wrote:
esquisseallure wrote:
Nectar wrote:That LHP looks frustrating
LOL. Irontech typically avoid advertising their placements. I rarely trust irontech to even attempt to create a suitable LHP. I'd put irontech on the below average score for LHP.
What about their silicon 166? Looks like a huge improvement in comparison to the image above.

viewtopic.php?f=388&t=151243

I've seen this specific doll and definitely would like to buy it at some point. The only reason I am going with a TPE now is because I had an issue with the current silicone doll I own so we came to the agreement of having a TPE doll of my choice sent to me free of charge.

esquisseallure · Post by **esquisseallure** » Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:25 pm

Aeron wrote:
esquisseallure wrote:
Nectar wrote:That LHP looks frustrating
LOL. Irontech typically avoid advertising their placements. I rarely trust irontech to even attempt to create a suitable LHP. I'd put irontech on the below average score for LHP.
What about their silicon 166? Looks like a huge improvement in comparison to the image above.

viewtopic.php?f=388&t=151243

Yes even I agree. This one is nice but even a good portion of their current model could go through a redesign again.

Pip-Doll88 · Post by **Pip-Doll88** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 8:54 am

Almost every company has hit or miss LHP. I generally think IT is above average overall, personally I think their Silicone models are doing a good job.

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 9:00 am

I have TPE IT158 and IT160. LHP is no good on these models. Also skeleton and outer TPE do not match. Very unnatural leg-movements when you lift their legs up.

Siliconemans advice: Avoid IT158 and IT160.

Cheers!

Sili

SyahMax · Post by **SyahMax** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 11:23 pm

I also agree with what was said earlier by other members in the thread. LHP is hit and miss with most companies, to one degree or another it seems. But I too think Irontech Doll is one of the better with LHP with their Silicone Dolls.
One of the worst lmhp imho is Jarliet dolls. Blessings