Status of 160G?

PartThree · Post by **PartThree** » Wed May 22, 2024 5:58 am

@XTDoll
Given the news about no anal channel in a broken mold, is there confirmation that the 160G is now available with both vaginal and anal channels?

thazehase · Post by **thazehase** » Thu May 23, 2024 2:30 am

PartThree wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 5:58 am @XTDoll
Given the news about no anal channel in a broken mold, is there confirmation that the 160G is now available with both vaginal and anal channels?

They stoped the production of the 160G entirely and replaced it with the 160H.

PartThree · Post by **PartThree** » Thu May 23, 2024 8:51 am

thazehase wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 2:30 am
PartThree wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 5:58 am @XTDoll
Given the news about no anal channel in a broken mold, is there confirmation that the 160G is now available with both vaginal and anal channels?
They stoped the production of the 160G entirely and replaced it with the 160H.

Ahhhhhh, now I'm getting this transition and all the changes mentioned in two orders. Now I'm getting the entire weight issue. You're getting sent the H's for sure. I'll be curious what the real world weight of it is. If it's under 75lbs I might go for one although you get spoiled by the lightweight 163F...

Given XT's ability to create a great sculpt with light weight, I really wish they'd pulls something in the 150-158cm range with a great set of G/H-cups and under 60lbs. That would be my perfect diversion...

jeep2639 · Post by **jeep2639** » Thu May 23, 2024 9:10 am

thazehase wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 2:30 am
PartThree wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 5:58 am @XTDoll
Given the news about no anal channel in a broken mold, is there confirmation that the 160G is now available with both vaginal and anal channels?
They stoped the production of the 160G entirely and replaced it with the 160H.

Are you sure? I thought it was a one-time problem. I would suggest to check with them. I thought the 160G was one of their newer ones. I might be wrong, though...

thazehase · Post by **thazehase** » Thu May 23, 2024 9:41 am

jeep2639 wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 9:10 am
thazehase wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 2:30 am
PartThree wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 5:58 am @XTDoll
Given the news about no anal channel in a broken mold, is there confirmation that the 160G is now available with both vaginal and anal channels?
They stoped the production of the 160G entirely and replaced it with the 160H.
Are you sure? I thought it was a one-time problem. I would suggest to check with them. I thought the 160G was one of their newer ones. I might be wrong, though...

A quote from my DMs:
Sent: Mon May 20, 2024 5:16 am
by XTDoll
hi thazehase,it is 160H.
Due to major flaws in the 160G mold, we have scrapped it and re-upgraded the model. On the premise that the body shape is basically the same, we have fine-tuned and perfected the body.This body type is currently one of our best sellers.

PartThree · Post by **PartThree** » Thu May 23, 2024 9:58 am

thazehase wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 9:41 am
jeep2639 wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 9:10 am
thazehase wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 2:30 am
PartThree wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 5:58 am @XTDoll
Given the news about no anal channel in a broken mold, is there confirmation that the 160G is now available with both vaginal and anal channels?
They stoped the production of the 160G entirely and replaced it with the 160H.
Are you sure? I thought it was a one-time problem. I would suggest to check with them. I thought the 160G was one of their newer ones. I might be wrong, though...
A quote from my DMs:
Sent: Mon May 20, 2024 5:16 am
by XTDoll
hi thazehase,it is 160H.
Due to major flaws in the 160G mold, we have scrapped it and re-upgraded the model. On the premise that the body shape is basically the same, we have fine-tuned and perfected the body.This body type is currently one of our best sellers.

As a new model and "one of our best sellers", I'm not surprised. The overall body shape is without exaggerated features and the boobs hang realistically. I had a college girlfriend shaped and endowed like this and she was an amazing treat...

jeep2639 · Post by **jeep2639** » Thu May 23, 2024 10:42 am

thazehase wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 9:41 am
jeep2639 wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 9:10 am
thazehase wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 2:30 am
PartThree wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 5:58 am @XTDoll
Given the news about no anal channel in a broken mold, is there confirmation that the 160G is now available with both vaginal and anal channels?
They stoped the production of the 160G entirely and replaced it with the 160H.
Are you sure? I thought it was a one-time problem. I would suggest to check with them. I thought the 160G was one of their newer ones. I might be wrong, though...
A quote from my DMs:
Sent: Mon May 20, 2024 5:16 am
by XTDoll
hi thazehase,it is 160H.
Due to major flaws in the 160G mold, we have scrapped it and re-upgraded the model. On the premise that the body shape is basically the same, we have fine-tuned and perfected the body.This body type is currently one of our best sellers.

You were right, and I was wrong... I thought I read it was an issue with just one body. That they forgot to put the anal cavity or something... I'm surprised they would scrap a light body and replace it with a heavier one. I know that I wouldn't have anything more than 60lb... My 163F is 55lb, and my new 161B (when it gets here...) is supposedly 55lb too. When they started working on her, and I thought she was going to be 160, B-cup, I was hoping to 50lb or even less (if the 163F is 55lb...), but it's still 55lb. Taking her out of the box to play is just about as much as I want to carry... Anyway, thanks for correcting me.

PartThree · Post by **PartThree** » Thu May 23, 2024 5:17 pm

jeep2639 wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 10:42 am You were right, and I was wrong... I thought I read it was an issue with just one body. That they forgot to put the anal cavity or something... I'm surprised they would scrap a light body and replace it with a heavier one. I know that I wouldn't have anything more than 60lb... My 163F is 55lb, and my new 161B (when it gets here...) is supposedly 55lb too. When they started working on her, and I thought she was going to be 160, B-cup, I was hoping to 50lb or even less (if the 163F is 55lb...), but it's still 55lb. Taking her out of the box to play is just about as much as I want to carry... Anyway, thanks for correcting me.

Yet, still on the website...

jeep2639 · Post by **jeep2639** » Thu May 23, 2024 5:46 pm

PartThree wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 5:17 pm
jeep2639 wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 10:42 am You were right, and I was wrong... I thought I read it was an issue with just one body. That they forgot to put the anal cavity or something... I'm surprised they would scrap a light body and replace it with a heavier one. I know that I wouldn't have anything more than 60lb... My 163F is 55lb, and my new 161B (when it gets here...) is supposedly 55lb too. When they started working on her, and I thought she was going to be 160, B-cup, I was hoping to 50lb or even less (if the 163F is 55lb...), but it's still 55lb. Taking her out of the box to play is just about as much as I want to carry... Anyway, thanks for correcting me.
Yet, still on the website...

And at last check, breasts still too big for me...