The Doll Forum

I think the 153B is your best doll so far. It balances hotness, plausibility, height, and weight better than your other dolls do. It looks like this was a deliberate attempt to optimize the design for SLE. It would be great to see you do the same in your weight reduction line with a 160-161 at 27-28...

I'm not sure if I've ever seen factory pics that look more like an actual woman. She almost looks like she could come to life and walk right up to you. This is an entirely different type of doll. Nothing is exaggerated or stylized, and the proportions are meant to be absolutely lifelike in person. H...

This is an outstanding design - hot, plausible, acceptable height, desirable weight. Not easy to do in SLE. Those measurements read like the correct answer to an engineering problem. This is what happens when a manufacturer approaches the design task analytically. Getting the height correct is most ...

JRG wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 8:29 pm I’d love to see a straight on standing front and back shot, just to get an idea on the curves

Very nice design! Hot, plausible, good weight, passable height. I think this is their best SLE so far. I found the full set of specs on a blog post a few minutes ago, along with these more revealing photos:

My favorite doll and head at the moment! Can't wait to see the pics and vids.

Am I missing something or is this model missing the anal cavity? The specifications show an anal depth of 14 cm. It could be the camera angle, or it's possible they hadn't completed those details of the mold when they made the first doll for marketing purposes. See the picture I posted above. I thi...

Dbalpha wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2024 3:35 pm Am I missing something or is this model missing the anal cavity?

The specifications show an anal depth of 14 cm. It could be the camera angle, or it's possible they hadn't completed those details of the mold when they made the first doll for marketing purposes.

XT, you are doing a great job of moving the doll market forward with better and better designs. You needed a good B-cup and it is good to see you offer one. If you are open to constructive feedback: The 8-cm taper from the under bust to the waist is very attractive, but it would have looked more pla...

This is a very nice sculpt - artistic and lifelike overall, beautiful boob shape and butt shape, and a full under bust of 68.5 cm. Unfortunately, it's much too heavy for most buyers. Not a good design choice in TPE. Irontech needs some lighter dolls. Their 163B in reduced weight silicone is a good t...

Thank you for the update. This is an exciting time for your company.

AngelKiss, this is a nice doll but it would have been better for most buyers at a more normal height and a much lower weight. I understand the desire for variety, but what about combining high attractiveness, high plausibility, normal height, and low weight? Have you done that on a doll yet? The 165...

I've always been amazed at how a doll (or woman) can have one look in photos, another look in a video, and a completely different look in person. I'm gradually learning to understand this difference and adjust for it as I look at dolls. Violetta looks like she would be absolutely stunning in person,...

Has Starpery announced a rough timeline for the rollout of WR 4.0? I wonder if they plan to release all the models at one time or roll them out one by one.

What are the reasons for the weight increase of 4kg from the 163F body? 1 cm taller but with smaller bust, where is the added weight going to? 29kg is still lighter than many competing dolls. I combined pictures of the 163F, 164C, 165E, and 168C. With all the details. When you see it, you'll unders...