The Doll Forum

NINJASEX wrote: ↑Tue Apr 16, 2024 11:06 pm The Thic Zone

More Sophia please! All the photos from her thread are gone.

Technological innovation brings a tear to my eye.

Great work! The added tear resistance is great and it looks sooooo soft

Woah! How've I not come across this yet? This is brilliant. What a huge change to appearance!

Had to type this up again because I was excited for a cute snaggletooth option, but I'm not sure how that'd actually play out in the real world... Could it be as cute as illustrations can make it look?

Aluminum reactivity is definitely a concern. You don't want it turning to mush inside your doll. There's coatings and anodizing, but who knows. I'm not too certain that weight savings would be dramatic enough to warrant the increase in cost. But... I've been curious about this myself, even consideri...

165 N imo. The 161j has a foam cask inside the legs/ it is not all tpe vs. the 165n. The 165n also just felt much better Can anyone back this up? The 161 is 7 whole KG heavier than the 165 somehow. I'd also like to avoid foam fillings, so how would I find this out? Weight reduction with foam in TPE...

12_21_2 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:01 am 165 N imo. The 161j has a foam cask inside the legs/ it is not all tpe vs. the 165n. The 165n also just felt much better

Can anyone back this up? The 161 is 7 whole KG heavier than the 165 somehow. I'd also like to avoid foam fillings, so how would I find this out?

TLDR; After digging around a ton more and cuddling with an WM150 and SLE160 every night now, I found that I still wanted a taller and thicker doll. Really wanted to go WM173 next, but today I just stumbled across the Funwest 165KK. (Edit: and now the 6YE 165N) Why is there hardly anybody who's purc...

What's the latest on your modification CK? I still haven't tried it yet. Same here, however, I decided to go back and add even more because the gel seemed to somewhat stick to the walls of the "pocket" the breasts have inside, and the aloe I used somewhat rose to the top? I don't believe ...

Maybe it's asking too much

dolls-castle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 5:28 am it would sacrifice the deep butt crack

but for curiosity's sake, would you mind explaining why this is the case? Is it a manufacturing limitation?

The Doll Advocate wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2024 9:39 am Not enough waist for that much rack .
Just my opinion.

Agreed. Would love to see these breasts on the 158G, but retaining the 175cm height.

Would love to see the 150M and 173H get updated!

I don't think the 160J is perfect, there's definitely still other things I prefer on my 150M, but that's subjective. And a 16g will take forever. I'd just keep some silipoxy handy before you do anything. So far so good for me though. I suggest anyone else wanting to do this, just take the flavor inj...

I've just added a whole bottle of what you linked in your first post to the right cheek. Really difficult not to inject air... Gonna have to pull some out now, but it's not bad. I'd suggest just being more patient than I am. Here's the thing though, I added that ~250ml, and it's nowhere near as larg...

Welp, looks like I'm buying a 160J.

You gonna do the breasts next? or am I gonna beat you to it?

Interested, pm'd