VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Zuxeh · Post by **Zuxeh** » Sun May 10, 2020 7:27 am

I'd just to like to note something, that I think we sometimes lose sight of, the doll community (like any other) has members of all tastes, some who of whom share the sames likes, and many still enjoying other things.

I dont think its sensible or feasible long term, for any manufacturer to produce a series of dolls all of which conform to the same set of ideals or traits, if they did, their customer base would shrink rapidly along with their profit margins - and with them, our hopes of future dolls and advancements.

Personally, I voted to keep this unchanged, because thats my taste (if it were up to me, every doll would be over 5'7 and as very curvy), but as soon as I saw the vote to change this won out, I immediately recognized that this is the best thing for WM - to seek out and act on the feedback from their community, and so its the best thing for me too, to support the manufacturers and enable them to continue providing the dolls we all love.

Just my two cents on the matter - stay safe all !

- Zux

YourNameHere · Post by **YourNameHere** » Sun May 10, 2020 6:54 pm

In case you have not seen, there are factory photos of the WM 172-D doll on LoveDolls UK. Looks like the owner got a replica of the snow bunny and looks amazing! I got the same thing so I am even more excited for when my personal factory pics are ready.

https://lovedoll.co.uk/tag/wm-172cm-d-cup/

GrayScale · Post by **GrayScale** » Fri May 22, 2020 10:14 pm

Here is the updated vagina. Just got my factory photos today.

Doll Master · Post by **Doll Master** » Fri May 22, 2020 10:29 pm

It's forward by at least 2cm. Not surprising given this company's track record.

Maybe they should hire me to show them where to hole goes. LOL

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Sat May 23, 2020 12:12 am

Looks very disappointing. WM quality. I bet she has terrible pussy spread too, another WM trademark.

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Sat May 23, 2020 12:58 am

My 172B for comparison:

: 20200523_054227.jpg (3.17 MiB) Viewed 1925 times

: 20200523_053056 cropped_edited.jpg (942.64 KiB) Viewed 1925 times

Bit of the old spread, but vagina and anus closer together, as they should be, not one on the Near Side of the Moon and the other on the Dark Side of the Moon!

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Sat May 23, 2020 1:51 pm

I can see that 172B has double clit. Very interesting design. Maybe Chinese anatomy really is different from western.

: _amazingWMdoubleClit.jpg (95.07 KiB) Viewed 1881 times

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Sat May 23, 2020 2:29 pm

[quote="Siliconeman"]I can see that 172B has double clit. Very interesting design. Maybe Chinese anatomy really is different from western.

Haha!

Never spotted that! Maybe it's to help her stimulation when lying on her back AND on her front

What bothers me, now that I see them on the photos, are the pits and other marks in the TPE in the area around the vagina and anus. She is the youngest of my dolls and quite frankly I have my doubts about the durability of this WM TPE.

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Sun May 24, 2020 4:31 am

A shot of Rashona (172B) lying on her front showing her lady parts. Both orifices are perfectly accessible in this position and although I haven't tried full doggy (I'm always concerned about damaging hands and wrists), I'm sure it would be fine.

I'm wondering whether it would have been better if WM had left the 172D alone, rather than produce the travesty we now have. I was considering a 172D in natural skin tone (I have a JY head that would go very nicely with it), despite my misgivings about the TPE quality, but with that redesigned LHP I won't bother now.

: 20200524_055327 (cropped 3x2)_edited.jpg (983.2 KiB) Viewed 1838 times

curious_person · Post by **curious_person** » Tue Aug 25, 2020 11:59 am

hah just looking back at this thread with the WM172D as my first doll recently purchased.

I'm discovering the LHP issue the hard way lol. It's still got enough "use cases" and I did know I was chosing it more for looks than "use". but now I see it seems they could have done better.
I figured I wouldn't get everything right on the first doll purchase. The thing is I really like the overall proportions and sculpt of the 172D. it's hard to find others that I like as much. But if they got this right (even just sticking with the 172B solution) it would have been "++". I'm looking around for ideas for a 2nd complimentary purchase (i'm also looking with great interest at siliconemans' modification story but I'm too nervous to try that just yet)

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Tue Aug 25, 2020 12:33 pm

Now the WM172D pussy should be re-re designed. Mandos !!!!

Oh, never mind! Will get myself nice HR166 and leave this WM carp on the shelves!

MannyCan · Post by **MannyCan** » Tue Aug 25, 2020 1:45 pm

Siliconeman wrote:I can see that 172B has double clit. Very interesting design. Maybe Chinese anatomy really is different from western.

Maybe its a Fourchette

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Tue Aug 25, 2020 1:59 pm

It's the cover of the second clit - extra stimulation when she's in doggy mode

Didn't tell you she's from an Off World colony, did I?

Post by **bigchilli** » Tue Aug 25, 2020 2:58 pm

GrayScale wrote:Here is the updated vagina. Just got my factory photos today.

woah
That looks tight
Looks a bit meh,bet it feels great though

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Tue Aug 25, 2020 3:05 pm

bigchilli wrote:
GrayScale wrote:Here is the updated vagina. Just got my factory photos today.
woah
That looks tight
Looks a bit meh, bet it feels great though

Going by the 172B, it will feel great