www.wmdolls.com

To Gel or not to Gel??

WM dolls was establish on 2012, we have own production base (located center of Greater Bay Area, Guangdong, China), which is one of the most professional and the biggest factory of realistic sex dolls in the world.
As pioneered TPE used and many famous brands' dolls manufacturer, We have been focusing on customer experience, and continue to work hard to develop new functions for dolls.
We have many patents and independently developed exclusive functions, Such as Breathing feature, Ball Joints Hand Skeleton, Real Oral Sex(ROS) Head, etc.
Website: www.wmdolls.com
User avatar
bigchilli
TDF Staff Alumni
TDF Staff Alumni
Posts: 8424
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:40 pm
Location: Bonnie Scotland
Contact:

To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by bigchilli »

Hey folks
I'm thinking of getting the new WM 162F or 164J but I'm not sure to go gel or hollow breasts

Here's my predicament...
Flame suit on! honestly I'm not really into large(natural) breasts but I love large fake breasts
You know the round porn star stuck on melons look :whistle:

I actually don't touch Mia's breasts much tbh,it's more a visual thing for me(although I do like the feel of them against my chest with her on top)

I keep reading how great the gel versions are but I'm completely torn
I do like the idea of them being heavy though
Just seeking so opinions

Thanks
BC

66gt350
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 213
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2020 11:16 am
Contact:

Re: To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by 66gt350 »

bigchilli wrote:Hey folks
I'm thinking of getting the new WM 162F or 164J but I'm not sure to go gel or hollow breasts

Here's my predicament...
Flame suit on! honestly I'm not really into large(natural) breasts but I love large fake breasts
You know the round porn star stuck on melons look :whistle:

I actually don't touch Mia's breasts much tbh,it's more a visual thing for me(although I do like the feel of them against my chest with her on top)

I keep reading how great the gel versions are but I'm completely torn
I do like the idea of them being heavy though
Just seeking so opinions

Thanks

I'm curious about this as well. My next doll is going to be the new IT 154 Plus, Nikki head, loooong curly hair. (I've faceapp'ed the hell out of her, OMG!) Sorry, got off track...The listings vary from vendor to vendor but most call then "H" cup. The gel sounds great, but????
BC

User avatar
Zippy81
Doll Elder
Doll Elder
Posts: 2435
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:16 am
Contact:

Re: To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by Zippy81 »

jumping-jello.gif
jumping-jello.gif (1.93 MiB) Viewed 7821 times
giphy.gif
giphy.gif (404.48 KiB) Viewed 7821 times
tenor.gif
tenor.gif (1.31 MiB) Viewed 7821 times
Yeeeeeeessssssss.

User avatar
Arthur1960
Doll Visionary
Doll Visionary
Posts: 14634
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 1:44 pm
Location: Suffolk, UK
Contact:

Re: To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by Arthur1960 »

Hi BC, I know where your coming from on this and coincidentally I've become a bit of a fan of that fake boob look too. Oddly enough in my younger days I wasn't so keen on that particular look but I think it was Briana Banks who turned me to the fake side as her enhanced boobs where like two perfectly symmetrical orbs and at the time she had this incredibly slim figure and legs that went on forever. So I blame Briana Banks for my infatuation with my Sarah's boobs as to my eye the WM155DD is reminiscent of her lovely bod. So back to your dilemma. As you know, my Mia has the gel option and there's no getting away from the fact that they are pretty damn close to the real thing, in terms of look, movement and feel. They are clearly a bit heavier and are softer but not in the way hollow boobs are, it does feel like you are squeezing a real boob (if memory serves!), so in one sense they are less like a gal whose had a boob job. Personally I'm sold on them but I am being watchful as I would imagine they could be more delicate, especially in the larger cup sizes but I think this will be an itch you will need to scratch otherwise you will just keep wondering what if? I've half a mind to get Sarah a new bod with gel boobs even though there's nothing wrong with her current one aside from a couple of broken finger wires, I suspect the rounder shape of the 155DD boobs with gel would be more like proper fake boobs, I can't picture the new 164J bod right now maybe someone in here already has one with the gel option?

User avatar
Levi7
Active Poster
Active Poster
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2016 5:33 pm
Contact:

Re: To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by Levi7 »

Hey,

I can't say anything about the 164J, but I have the 162F with the gel breasts. I would never take a doll with hollow breasts again. Never ever! These things are freaking amazing, the jiggle, the realness, the bounce. Optically they look exactly like hollow breasts, so they don't hang or something. I think gel is just a plus.

Greetings :wink:
WM 158D #36
WM 166C #162
WM 162F #266
WM 162E #159
WM 156H #233
WM 174G #372, #336
(WM 158L Bimbo #273, #266)

My cute little Luna:
viewtopic.php?t=152869&hilit=156h+luna

User avatar
Karrot
Doll Elder
Doll Elder
Posts: 2621
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:48 pm
Location: The Patch
Contact:

Re: To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by Karrot »

Got to agree on the Gel fill. Maddie (158G) has gel fill and they are amazingly soft, squishy and jiggly, and most importantly the move with gravity

K
I'm just a boy, standing in front of a girl, trying not to masturbate.
Xiaoli - DS Doll 160+ with Jaiyi head (Picture Thread here)
Kaia - DS Doll 167 Evo with Kayla head (Picture Thread here)
Xiaoli and Kaia together (Picture Thread Here)
Jess, Cindy, and Pinky (TeddyBabes) (Picture Thread Here)
Maddie - WM158G #233 (Picture Thread Here)
Romi - FunWest FWD078 (Picture Thread Here]

MrGeeGee
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2020 10:05 am
Contact:

Re: To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by MrGeeGee »

bigchilli wrote:Hey folks
Flame suit on! honestly I'm not really into large(natural) breasts but I love large fake breasts
You know the round porn star stuck on melons look :whistle:
I know what you mean. :wink:
As someone I knew once said...apart from the look obviously it was because a girl had consciously made a decision to hyper-sexualise herself which was in itself a turn-on. Also, with real big boobs they can sometimes look great but it's just more to go wrong isn't it? :lol:

I can't really answer your question....yet. I've opted for hollow on my 166C. The research I did suggested wasn't much in it for the smaller cup sizes. Visually because of the above I did have a fascination for a shorter M-cup doll but thought for my first doll I'd be better off going for a more realistic shape. Not that the 166C "supermodel" is THAT realistic of course, but you get what I mean.

Dafficio12
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 9:26 pm
Contact:

Re: To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by Dafficio12 »

My first doll with gel boobs (WM 165 D-cup) arrived about two months ago. When I first opened the shipping carton and felt these novel innovations, I was genuinely shocked at how soft and pliable they were. Believe it or not, after having experienced only dolls with hollow or solid TPE boobs for five years, these new gel breasts were so malleable as to feel “unnatural” to me and I initially thought I’d made a big mistake in ordering them. After spending a day with the doll, however, my initial assessment underwent a complete turnaround. Perhaps I too had been away from the real thing for too long to immediately appreciate how astonishingly realistic Jinsan’s gel boobs feel and behave. I would never order another doll without them. That being said, it’s important to note that my assessment is based only on a doll from Jinsan, a doll maker who appears to have mastered this technology. My intent is not to downgrade any other doll manufacturer but I would imagine that it’s possible to create a gel boob with just a small gel-filled central cavity that feels not much different from a hollow boob but I have no direct experience to confirm this impression. My WM doll’s gel boobs feel so uniformly soft that they must be composed mostly of gel to achieve this new level of realism. Bravo, Jinsan!! Thanks so much for continuing to push the doll technology envelope!!

User avatar
PDutus
~ Member ~
~ Member ~
Posts: 5718
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 10:19 am
Contact:

Re: To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by PDutus »

My only experience of gel breasts is with those of my JY166 muscular and now I wouldn't go with anything else (unless gel wasn't available as an option).

My WM172B was bought pre-gel and hers might be too small anyway, but if I ever get a 172D or a 167 fitness, they would certainly have gel breasts :)
My girls:
Sophie - JY 175 (JY Head #167)
Valentina - JY 175 (JY Head #101)
Kiania - Sino 161 (Heads S6 & S7)
Rashona - WM 172B (WM Head #64)
Helga - JY 166 (JY head #101)
Patsy - JY 166 (JY Head #102)
Ingrid - JY 166 (SM Head #76)
Monique - JY 165SR (JY Head #134)

Yogi
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:38 pm
Location: Québec, Canada
Contact:

Re: To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by Yogi »

Definatly gel!
With a sample size of only one, I am no expert. My Layla (166C) has great boobs. I love the way they feel, look and jiggle.
Not being a fan of large breasts, I cannot offer an opinion, but Layla's are so realistic, I would not order another doll without gel breasts.

User avatar
bigchilli
TDF Staff Alumni
TDF Staff Alumni
Posts: 8424
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:40 pm
Location: Bonnie Scotland
Contact:

Re: To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by bigchilli »

Appreciate the advice guys

After viewing a couple of videos with slow motion I'm still really undecided.
I'm not actually a fan of the jiggle or the way they splay apart tbh,I'm just not really into natural breasts if I'm being completely honest
As for feel,it's kind of a moot point as I don't really touch the breasts.
I prefer the fake look that don't move when a chick is bouncing.

The main factor attracting me to Gel is the added weight,99% of the time I have my dolls on top
That added weight against my chest sounds very appealing

User avatar
JJb_ing
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2020 1:01 am
Contact:

Re: To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by JJb_ing »

If you haven't seen my contribution to the gel boob option, here you go.





I suggest yes, just for the feel of the squishyness when you hug her. I really do love of feel of them squeezing against my chest. Hmmmm boobs~

User avatar
bigchilli
TDF Staff Alumni
TDF Staff Alumni
Posts: 8424
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:40 pm
Location: Bonnie Scotland
Contact:

Re: To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by bigchilli »

JJb_ing wrote:If you haven't seen my contribution to the gel boob option, here you go.





I suggest yes, just for the feel of the squishyness when you hug her. I really do love of feel of them squeezing against my chest. Hmmmm boobs~
Yeah I had watched them already(a few times :whistle:)
That's not really a look that does it for me


I'm more into this look
This is my idea of perfect
Attachments
Rc97a90e7cbf7e28b1ff009b7ec7e16a2.gif
Rc97a90e7cbf7e28b1ff009b7ec7e16a2.gif (1.53 MiB) Viewed 7559 times

User avatar
SimonSays7
Doll Advisor
Doll Advisor
Posts: 852
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2016 1:03 pm
Contact:

Re: To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by SimonSays7 »

If you don't want the bounce or jiggle, why not just go for solid? It sounds like that's more your thing, and either gel or hollow are more prone to fail/damage than solid are... unless you want resale value, (many of us dawgs I think are crazy for gel as other posters have suggested, ignoring your own preferances, lol! ) or unless weight is a big concern, in which case hollow may be better.
Let's normalize human desire!

"Be whoever you are, do whatever you want to do, just so long as you don't hurt anyone".
A trans woman in HAIR, the musical, 1967

User avatar
john1972
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7746
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 11:07 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Re: To Gel or not to Gel??

Post by john1972 »

Zippy81

Yum I like Jello lol.
But noooo I have to agree that excessive jiggle is kinda fake .
I am sure getting the perfect blend of TPE/Silicone and either air or gel
to make the breast just right is probably some kind of mad scientist stuff lol.

On a interesting note over the years seeing videos and such of members dolls breast
That these TPE dolls can really get there Jiggle on if soft TPE.
But I remember members complaining that there Silicone dolls breast where just hard
and not very real feeling.
But interesting I have no idea if like I said about the Mad Scientist comment on a serious
note there HAS to be something they are doing different these days with Silicone that has
greatly improved the look and feeling on today's dolls breast.
It is very impressive really.

Now if you ask me , Would I get Gel or Inflated breast.
I WOULD consider Gel but I do not trust the inflated breast system.
I would be worried that somehow they would slowly deflate and you would end up with flat
flappy boob syndrom lol.
And NO ONE wants Flappy Boob Syndrom lol.

But the question id ask you is are you getting a TPE doll or a Silicone doll?
Is it really needed with these softer TPE dolls?

Post Reply

INFORMATIONS