168cm slim doll and 168cm plus doll comparison

Rtechguy · Post by **Rtechguy** » Tue Nov 13, 2018 4:33 am

I find this a little easier to tell the differences. The scale in in pictures is a little off. I just took the pics that Irontech posted and put them side by side with no modification as to not misrepresent. So, height may not be accurate.

: 168 Rear; 168 rear.png (209.28 KiB) Viewed 1638 times

: 168 Side; 168 side.png (158.26 KiB) Viewed 1638 times

: 168 Front; 168 front.png (177.85 KiB) Viewed 1638 times

kryten1 · Post by **kryten1** » Tue Nov 13, 2018 4:48 am

I prefer the slim version-she's hot

Post by **irontechdoll** » Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:33 am

Thanks, Rtechguy! You are helping other members to understand it easier!

Best regards
Leonard

Dollicious2 · Post by **Dollicious2** » Thu Nov 15, 2018 9:25 am

Why not have 3 of your favorite doll body out of all that are offered might be the better question.
After living with 2 of them for many months the 3rd one is a no brainer for me

Not going to get into the long story of why I am going to have 3 of this doll body.

I will however say again that I am crazy about this doll body and with the artwork Irontech is incorporating with the great TPE blend and skeleton in these dolls they'll soon be in the top 3 manufacturers if they keep this good work and service up.

That said it would be nice if in the photo from backside of the doll didn't have hair covering the area where them bone bumps used to be

Marked in blue

: 20181115_090623.jpg (274.78 KiB) Viewed 1622 times

As for the hip placement and leg length here marked in yellow , I believe this looks completely realistic and correctly done , couldn't ask for more realism in the body propositions and over all shape.
The hips are longer like real women got
We like to call them child bearing hips

If you look at where the waistline is too you can see the legs don't appear short after all, it's all in the angles the body is looked at in how it is perceived but... yes there are plenty examples of real women and doll women that have different lengths and thicknesses of body parts & all plus many dolls are made with fantasy proportions or flat out disproportionate body's.
I for one look at this body and think to myself "damn...the perfect doll... Finally a perfect doll for me that is affordable and great quality !"
DL2

Dollsampler · Post by **Dollsampler** » Thu Nov 15, 2018 2:39 pm

AYUMI body is built Indeed on the basis of realistic ratios but on top of that has dreambody measurements as per some sampling polls.
As far as the comments on the pictures of the reboot are concerned it is too early to judge.
IRT has so far not compared side by side on the same pictures the silhouette of the original (Altough we saw earlier that SANGMEI used one original TPE body to sculpt the Template necessary for the new mould) with the silhouette of the reboot. Therefore I look forward to seeing that comparison carried out by Dollicious for example before deciding if the new AYUMI body is a correct copy or not.Two or three centimeters difference here and there can change even such a large body a lot for the best or the worst.

Dollicious2 · Post by **Dollicious2** » Sat Nov 17, 2018 2:41 am

Dollsampler wrote:AYUMI body is built Indeed on the basis of realistic ratios but on top of that has dreambody measurements as per some sampling polls.
As far as the comments on the pictures of the reboot are concerned it is too early to judge.
IRT has so far not compared side by side on the same pictures the silhouette of the original (Altough we saw earlier that SANGMEI used one original TPE body to sculpt the Template necessary for the new mould) with the silhouette of the reboot. Therefore I look forward to seeing that comparison carried out by Dollicious for example before deciding if the new AYUMI body is a correct copy or not.Two or three centimeters difference here and there can change even such a large body a lot for the best or the worst.

I know and highly appreciate that your very meticulous in your evaluations of dolls Dollsampler

hence the username "Dollsampler"

And this may sound funny but I can tell just by looking at the photos they have provided here in this thread the body is an exact copy of the original except the vagina has been altered slightly.
We shall see when my doll gets here as I put the ladys side by side and inspect the new lady friend just how exact she really is yes , in all aspects I'll add too , the works.
As for the bumps on the back the photo provided doesn't show that area of her back...

Can we see the backbone please ?

Also after looking closely it may be that them adorable dimples on the small of the back are missing...

or it could be that these photos have software enhancements that could cover this making the skin look flawless.
It would be a bit sad if they were forgotten or leaving them out of this new mould...

Please do elaborate if the dimples are still on the body for this new mould Leonard or just show close up photo of it like I did above.
DL2

Post by **Booty Call Dolls** » Sat Nov 17, 2018 2:44 am

Tech guy and Dollicious2,
As always, the BCD family ROCKS!
Jeff

Post by **Tsall** » Sat Nov 17, 2018 9:05 am

Dollicious2 wrote:As for the bumps on the back the photo provided doesn't show that area of her back...
...
Can we see the backbone please ?

SSIronTech posted an early picture right out of the mold without hair on her back: Sexy back:Irontech original 168cm Ayumi

Dollicious2 wrote:Also after looking closely it may be that them adorable dimples on the small of the back are missing...

BCD has some more pictures from this set: A very close look at the Iron tech 168
It looks like the dimples are gone or nearly invisible. I don't mind that.

Dollicious2 · Post by **Dollicious2** » Sat Nov 17, 2018 2:13 pm

Tsall wrote:
Dollicious2 wrote:As for the bumps on the back the photo provided doesn't show that area of her back...
...
Can we see the backbone please ?
SSIronTech posted an early picture right out of the mold without hair on her back: Sexy back:Irontech original 168cm Ayumi

Dollicious2 wrote:Also after looking closely it may be that them adorable dimples on the small of the back are missing...
BCD has some more pictures from this set: A very close look at the Iron tech 168
It looks like the dimples are gone or nearly invisible. I don't mind that.

Oh Thanks Tsall

Wow I forgot about that photo and thread
But if you look closely at that image it looks like they may still be there

: 20181117_142046.jpg (66.7 KiB) Viewed 1561 times

I have 2 of the originals here and funny thing about these dimples is they aren't always prevalent or visible, its truly an amazing doll , even the weight of the doll makes her more realistic although cumbersome to lift in certain ways it factors in marvelous during sexual encounters especially standing from behind.
If the dimples are indeed not there it's not the end of the universe but I would definitely prefer they stayed.
DL2

Dollicious2 · Post by **Dollicious2** » Sat Nov 17, 2018 3:09 pm

They are slight dimples and I notice one of my dolls has slightly less depression of them and the other more visible.
I like this photo showing how they are slight but visible however it's all in how the lady standing or sitting plus the lighting on the skin and the obvious absence of photo finish software usage.
Now you see them

Now you don't

https://www.instagram.com/p/Bo5_fclF-yd ... 3fvlkiv07x
DL2

Dollicious2 · Post by **Dollicious2** » Sun Nov 25, 2018 7:09 am

Placed my order on 9th November
Still no word of how much longer it will be till doll finished

My emails are going to spam folder Leonard
Last time I emailed you was the 17th November
I emailing you today and they going straight to spam

I am simply enquiring about the progress of my doll !

Please respond here Leonard
You didn't answer my PM last week also...

DL2