Sex Robots
- SynthetikReality95
- Ex-Member
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 4:15 pm
Re: Sex Robots
- deerman
- ~ Member ~
- Posts: 8376
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:52 am
- Location: Just past the pond, the last deer trail on the left
Re: Sex Robots
- AlexaTilbrook
- Ex-Member
- Posts: 1147
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:20 pm
- Location: EM12gr
- Contact:
Re: Sex Robots
TL;DR, but the answer is YES to everything you said. I have said elsewhere that this Kathleen Richardson needs a nice hot cup of shut the fuck up because everyone else is in agreement with that statement.AAAP wrote:The miserable woman at the end of the video, Kathleen Richardson...
Last month a leading robot ethicist warned that 'sexbots' could seriously damage human relationships. Did she make up that title herself?
Dr Kathleen Richardson told the BBC the technology is 'unnecessary and undesirable'. FOR HER
'Sex robots seem to be a growing focus in the robotics industry and the models that they draw on - how they will look, what roles they would play - are very disturbing indeed,' TO HER
'We think that the creation of such robots will contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women, adults and children, men and men and women and women,' she said. Except Sex Robots are only the first step, because they will generate money, but we will eventually have robots used for other purposes. She doesn't seem to be able to see beyond her nose far enough to address this. Will your robot waitress have the same effect?
Dr Richardson, a robot ethicist at De Montfort University in Leicester, wants to raise awareness of the issue and persuade those developing sex robots to rethink how their technology is used. I wonder what kind of vibrator she owns?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... eople.html
73 de KI5JYD