Featured on the Daily Show

Maecer · Post by **Maecer** » Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:02 am

So I was up last night watching the Daily Show when I came across this segment. I thought it was a pleasant segment for Matt and his company.

Post by **Swan** » Fri Apr 23, 2021 12:02 pm

Good vid! thanks for posting

Post by **Rock13** » Fri Apr 23, 2021 12:23 pm

I'd consider buying a mature looking robot modeled after Desi Lydic, especially if it can do the stuff that she was doing in the chair. As for Kathleen Richardson, who's been hammering at us for years, she's a lost cause and is only obsessed with who's fucking what and whom because no one is fucking her. I guess having a PHd doesn't really compensate for everything.

Leaf · Post by **Leaf** » Fri Apr 23, 2021 12:51 pm

That was fun to watch!

Post by **john1972** » Fri Apr 23, 2021 1:45 pm

That was pretty cool .
Thanks for posting this

Gaijin · Post by **Gaijin** » Fri Apr 23, 2021 2:05 pm

Rock13 wrote: I guess having a PHd doesn't really compensate for everything.

It really doesn't. All it means was that your studies were hyper-focused on one question for a few years. Outside of that specific field, there's no reason to expect them to have better knowledge about stuff than the rest of us. My wife works with several PhD holders, and her coworkers without them are more useful for the team in general.

Post by **Rock13** » Fri Apr 23, 2021 2:40 pm

Gaijin wrote:
Rock13 wrote: I guess having a PHd doesn't really compensate for everything.
It really doesn't. All it means was that your studies were hyper-focused on one question for a few years. Outside of that specific field, there's no reason to expect them to have better knowledge about stuff than the rest of us. My wife works with several PhD holders, and her coworkers without them are more useful for the team in general.

Well, I was referring to this particular "Dr." She has been on an anti-doll/robot crusade for many years- the rationalization hamster runs hard and fast in her head and she consistently tries to assert that "reducing" a woman to a synthetic replica is immoral and a blight on our society while she's perfectly fine with a man being "reduced" to just a synthetic model of the part that a woman can slip into herself. I'll bet she has drawers full of them.

df888 · Post by **df888** » Tue Apr 27, 2021 3:57 am

Rock13 wrote:
Gaijin wrote:
Rock13 wrote: I guess having a PHd doesn't really compensate for everything.
It really doesn't. All it means was that your studies were hyper-focused on one question for a few years. Outside of that specific field, there's no reason to expect them to have better knowledge about stuff than the rest of us. My wife works with several PhD holders, and her coworkers without them are more useful for the team in general.
Well, I was referring to this particular "Dr." She has been on an anti-doll/robot crusade for many years- the rationalization hamster runs hard and fast in her head and she consistently tries to assert that "reducing" a woman to a synthetic replica is immoral and a blight on our society while she's perfectly fine with a man being "reduced" to just a synthetic model of the part that a woman can slip into herself. I'll bet she has drawers full of them.

And sadly society and lawmakers will listen to this "Dr."!

tanman9990 · Post by **tanman9990** » Tue Apr 27, 2021 5:55 am

This forum never fails to produce cringe.

Rock13 wrote:...she consistently tries to assert that "reducing" a woman to a synthetic replica is immoral and a blight on our society...

Imagine being so devoid of interesting personality traits that you see a glorified plastic teddy bear with holes as sexual competition.

df888 · Post by **df888** » Tue Apr 27, 2021 10:42 am

I don't like how there seems to always be a counter argument to having a doll. Rather than just doing a positive story on them.

Post by **Rock13** » Tue Apr 27, 2021 10:53 am

df888 wrote:I don't like how there seems to always be a counter argument to having a doll. Rather than just doing a positive story on them.

Even without religious qualms, etc., it's either too far afield or too futuristic for some people to get their heads around. One theme that runs through many of these articles is the refusal by both authors and so-called expert consultants to accept that some people might prefer a synthetic companion to the intimate companionship of other people.