New Giant Mama Doll 165N

SaumonGravleux · Post by **SaumonGravleux** » Fri Apr 29, 2022 3:04 am

Jets Fan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 29, 2022 2:13 am
It’s a shame because the 165N has both, an idealized body but also realistic musculature. The ultimate biG tit, big booty doll with a human sized waist. Just not a human placed vagina.

I couldn't agree more ! It makes me sad because she's really the perfect dream body to me.

And the fact that the manufacturer stays silent is not a good sign about a possible improvement on this issue.

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Fri Apr 29, 2022 4:08 am

Mamilla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 29, 2022 2:14 am That's probably the first ever pic taken of the 165N it still has the ugly butt creases. We are all guessing here until we get an answer, but showing old photos and saying the body didn't get updated is like showing an old picture of yourself claiming you never aged.

Well the Jets Fan just claimed that the 165N really has two moulds. The original one which is showing at the photo which I posted and a new one that is even worse and which I named a sad cyclops.

Sad Cyclops version, please inspect her beauty!

: 165N_LHP2_SAD_CYCLOPS.jpg (72.98 KiB) Viewed 1948 times

Thread here: viewtopic.php?t=141662&hilit=165N&start=30

I would stay away from the 165N

Cheers!

Sili

SaumonGravleux · Post by **SaumonGravleux** » Fri Apr 29, 2022 4:15 am

Siliconeman wrote: ↑Fri Apr 29, 2022 4:08 am
Sad Cyclops version, please inspect her beauty!

165N_LHP2_SAD_CYCLOPS.jpg

Wait what?! What the actual fuck?! Who in their right mind would design this and seriously say "well we nailed it! True to the real deal!".

Oh well, it's the same in video games, programmers and designers rarely play the games, which explains why in older games there were ergonomy problems.

Maybe they should try their own design here.

Mamilla · Post by **Mamilla** » Fri Apr 29, 2022 6:10 am

Siliconeman wrote: ↑Fri Apr 29, 2022 4:08 am
Mamilla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 29, 2022 2:14 am That's probably the first ever pic taken of the 165N it still has the ugly butt creases. We are all guessing here until we get an answer, but showing old photos and saying the body didn't get updated is like showing an old picture of yourself claiming you never aged.
Sad Cyclops version, please inspect her beauty!

Cheers!

Sili

Sad Cyclops! Whahaha :haha4:

Mamilla · Post by **Mamilla** » Fri Apr 29, 2022 6:17 am

I've seen the bad one and thought it was only mcidcbcmd having a bad one off.. but veurm004 also having a bad one.. hmm... I also read that the other guy who had the Sad Cyclops version was told he should have left the doll in the crate/box whatever and not have put the doll in a doggy position.

Nice surprise when you wanna go doggy and are met with that..

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Fri Apr 29, 2022 7:18 am

This is both very funny and very sad at the same time. Basically if you order a 165N you will get bad LHP or very very bad LHP. Take your pick!... There is no 165N with good LHP !!!!!!

We all would appreciate if the vendor starting this post or 6Ye would comment on this subject.

Sili

Mamilla · Post by **Mamilla** » Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:09 am

astronomyguy is probably one of the lucky ones. If you see his response to mcidcbcmd here: viewtopic.php?t=147978&start=30

the ass does not have the weird creases and the holes aren't miles apart / pointing down (aka Cyclops mode) in doggy.

Nectar · Post by **Nectar** » Sat Apr 30, 2022 3:38 pm

I have done my research and after reading all the comments I can confirm the sheer disappointment of advertising and false narrative of this "New doll" I actually thought it was a new body or just an upgrade of the original 165N (Horrible LHP) then realized why would they advertise 161 J cup 6ye but list it as a 161 L cup or 165 N cup? And why do 165 & 161 look so similar??

Makes me wonder what model has a better LHP 161cm 6ye premium looks good as advertised I think? lol Ugh.

not0today · Post by **not0today** » Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:25 pm

What a shame. She's such a lovely girl, but all the inconsistencies in the listing are heartbreaking.

Post by **Sexy Sex Doll** » Tue May 17, 2022 11:11 pm

Correction, this doll is 161L

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Wed May 18, 2022 6:35 am

Sexy Sex Doll wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 11:11 pm Correction, this doll is 161L

Anthony191 stated earlier that 161J and 161L are the same doll. The measurements are exactly the same.

Why confuse things? 161J already is the perfect BBW doll and 161J has been mentioned in several topics as being the ultimate perfect LHP BBW girl. If you are trying to change the 161J to 161L you are starting all over again. In stead of people going oh, the great 161J, respects! They go: What the hell is 161L???

Cheers!

Sili

Ygdrasilxyz · Post by **Ygdrasilxyz** » Fri Aug 26, 2022 8:36 pm

The 165 and 161 (L or J, whatever) are very similar bodies, but I don't think they're pretending the latter to be the former. Based on those recent photoshoots, the torso and waist don't match. The second is clearly shorter and chunkier. Hell, even the naughty bits are different, and I'm not talking about placement right now - 161 has a nice slit, 165 is more compact.

King Solo · Post by **King Solo** » Fri Aug 26, 2022 8:48 pm

Yeah, they're both very similar.... The 161L has a slightly bigger butt, while the 165N is bit more sporty. But that's about it.

If I really like the body of the 161L after getting her, I might also get the 165N in a different skin tone to add to my collection.

Ygdrasilxyz · Post by **Ygdrasilxyz** » Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:34 pm

Personally I wouldn't buy either of them. Curvy, but not my kind of curvy. I think there's a sweet spot if the waist is around 65-70cm that makes the hourglass stand out but also giving them enough thickness. Neither the former's 58cm waist or the latter's 80cm waist are in that area.