OK, in all seriousness (yep got he was wearing pantyhose) The LHP saga has been going on since day one TPE doll and earlier in some silicone brands, and as Sete has identified some brands struggle more than others due to the doll physique.
In my reviews I often discuss rear vs neutral vs front bias and this primarily refers to the vag cavity placement for positional access.
Ironically an organic women would be neutral biased, but her pelvis to hip joint and femur joints articulated differently from dollies, hence offer more flexibility for access.
Anyone remember the post where old mate finally got married, put his dolly away but ended up sending his wife back as her LHP was off...so back to dolly..
Point being it is a preference for positional choice as remember makers need to also ensure sufficient material remains between the front and rear entries, to prevent tear through into one big messy cavity. Ergo if they bias dolls with bigger buttocks more so for front access and dolls with smaller buttocks more so for neutral or rear. As`far a positioning goes, you just got to read reviews and do you home work.
We never seem to have an access problem , more of an effort doing the clean up and put them back in there posed positions problem. That is just as much of a workout as dollyfun was.
Oh yeah..the WM 155 D is very accessible from the rear, she was a 2015 doll make of memory ...
even though she appears to have a very forward located vag cavity, due to the shape of her glutes (buttocks) when she is in a L shape position..both targts easily accessable from the rear.
https://us.dollstudio.org/products/doll ... s/wm-155dd
