IT 161F ___ MTV Measurment?

Marnack1313 · Post by **Marnack1313** » Tue Aug 22, 2023 3:05 am

Does anyone know what the MTV measurement is on the IT 161F model??? I cannot find it anywhere. I appreciate your help!
Kindest Regards!

Panther68 · Post by **Panther68** » Tue Aug 22, 2023 5:52 pm

I am assuming you are asking about the TPE 161 doll. Here is the link to my Tale of the Tape on this doll with MTV.

viewtopic.php?p=1830058&hilit=Panther+161#p1830058

Irontech-doll · Post by **Irontech-doll** » Wed Aug 23, 2023 1:39 am

hey see here!

mebaru · Post by **mebaru** » Thu Aug 31, 2023 10:15 am

I was once dismayed at Iron Tech for offering a hole length for LHP, which has been said for a long time in TDF, but I was surprised to see that the manufacturer itself has recently improved the body of the body by talking about LHP!
Siliconeman, who is more concerned about LHP than anyone else, must be very pleased!

But as for MTV (length from mouth to vagina), do you dare to pretend that you don't know?
What is this?
When I was first considering buying an irontech doll, this 161F was my first choice, because I wanted a doll with short legs, let alone Leg 31cm. However, the doll I actually purchased was the 163+! According to the official IronTec nominal size of 88cm, it was not eligible, but after reading a report by TDF's leading panser, I realized that it was actually no longer than 75cm, so I decided to go with 163+!

Marnack1313 · Post by **Marnack1313** » Mon Sep 04, 2023 8:35 pm

Thank you all, for your insights and clarifying the accuracy of the actual specs! Mebaru, after reading these posts, I now am torn between the IT 161 and the IT 163+.
Panther 68, the link you provided "take of the tape" was extremely helpful! BTW, Your photos are amazing! I would have thought I was looking at a women's Cosmopolitan Magazine! Well done! Thank you all!

mebaru · Post by **mebaru** » Sat Sep 09, 2023 11:28 am

Marnack1313 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 8:35 pm Thank you all, for your insights and clarifying the accuracy of the actual specs! Mebaru, after reading these posts, I now am torn between the IT 161 and the IT 163+.
Panther 68, the link you provided "take of the tape" was extremely helpful! BTW, Your photos are amazing! I would have thought I was looking at a women's Cosmopolitan Magazine! Well done! Thank you all!

Have you already decided to purchase a doll?
The 163+ was highly praised for its realism on the IronTech forums when it was first released, but now the concept of the doll seems a bit dated. 161F is a slightly newer body and seems to have evolved in its own way. 161F can sitting in a kneeling position, but the 163+ can't. I chose the evo skeleton, but this was unexpected...

161F- Japanese way of sitting "seiza"

Panther68 · Post by **Panther68** » Sat Sep 09, 2023 1:19 pm

Marnack1313 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 8:35 pm Thank you all, for your insights and clarifying the accuracy of the actual specs! Mebaru, after reading these posts, I now am torn between the IT 161 and the IT 163+.
Panther 68, the link you provided "take of the tape" was extremely helpful! BTW, Your photos are amazing! I would have thought I was looking at a women's Cosmopolitan Magazine! Well done! Thank you all!

Hey Marnack, here is another link I did of the 163+ with side by side of the 163, but I also did some with the 161F also.

viewtopic.php?t=115611