Two NEW sets of PHOTOS of the IRON TECH 167

[Booty Call Dolls]

Hi,
Enjoy..
Here is Tina!

[Booty Call Dolls]

And here is Gina!

[SeriousT]

Oh dear, that Gina. As always they look amazing.

[nameless_void]

Are these really the same doll? The boobs on the first one look twice as big

[Kazuya]

Are these really the same doll? The boobs on the first one look twice as big

Agree, these are 2 different dolls. The 2nd one (the nicer of the two) has smaller breast and longer legs.

[Booty Call Dolls]

Hi,
I contacted Iron tech.

[UpperLower]

Hi,
I contacted Iron tech.

I made contact with Matthew from Irontech a few days ago regarding this issue as I’m trying to decide on a body for a custom head. The reply I got are as follows…

“ Thank you for your inquiry regarding the 167cm silicone dolls. I appreciate your interest, and I'm happy to provide you with the details. The two different 167cm silicone dolls have the same body measurements, and all our silicone dolls come with gel breasts by default.”

I thought perhaps one doll had gel breasts and the other was possibly solid? Yet I’m still not convinced these are the same doll.

[Booty Call Dolls]

Looks like Gina is atleast a full cup smaller IMHO

[UpperLower]

I’m thinking Gina might be the 169cm mistakenly advertised as the 167cm

https://www.irontechdoll.com/products/b ... 69cm-nabi/

[Booty Call Dolls]

I think you are onto something!

[UpperLower]

Well...

A talk with Irontech about estimates on a custom made head just turned into a purchase for the 167cm "Tina." So I'll be able to visually and physically confirm if Tina is a different body from Gina. My hope is the pictures are slightly deceiving and the breasts are slightly smaller than my Starpery 171cm silicone. At most, they at least appear perkier. Gel breasts are the default, but I chose the combination of the ultra soft silicone skin and solid breasts. When I got gel breasts for my Starpery, I noticed they are slightly droopier than my preference, but still tolerable. The way they feel wasn't as natural to me as gel filled TPE feels, though I did visually enjoy their sway movement during play. I also vowed to myself to go hybrid after my silicone experience with Starpery, but I want to experience Irontech's Ultra Soft to see the difference.

I was planning on getting a custom head first, but I'm not done asking around for estimates. This doll purchase was pretty much inevitable for me anyway. I find the upward positioned nipples and that ass hard to pass by. It was either this doll or Angel Kiss's 173cm C-cup. In the end, it came down to my eagerness to try the Automatic BJ and WM/Angel Kiss hasn't even begun R&D on this feature. The best I've heard is that they might attempt it. The 173cm is still on my wish list though. And now the wait begins.

Doll Type: 167cm silicone ultra soft body in Natural skin tone
Heads: S1 ROS head, S18 ROS head
Features: EVO skeleton, Oral Sex Movement, Solid breasts, Gel butt, Finger joints with hard hands, Standing Feet Without Bolts
Color Preferences: Nipple Color - Pink, Areola Size - 3cm, Vagina Texture - B4, Vagina Color - Natural, No pubic hair
Additional Details: Nipple Color - Pink, Areola Size - 3cm, Fingernails - G, Toenails - 2

[Booty Call Dolls]

Hi,
I was told

There are two reasons for the difference:
1- Dolls wear bikinis that lift up their breasts to make them appear larger
2- The photo was taken from a different Angle

Time will tell...

[bulldick]

The doll looks great, lets see which body she is

[4891d]

Side-by-side photos of the 167 and 169 models would be useful to clearly see the similarities and differences.

I have also seen considerable differences between different sellers for the weight specifications of the 167 cm model. Could Irontech clarify this, because this will undoubtedly be an important element in the choice between these two models?