NEW AK8 168
-
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2022 12:36 am
- Contact:
NEW AK8 168
This new AK8 is very much in line with the previous two new dolls, the 162 & 167- tall, athletic, small to medium breasts. The only thing I notice about the AK 8 is the thinner legs below the thighs, kind of a return to the "toothpick" style leg that I felt plagued the WM line for too long. But she looks fantastic. Angelkiss is doing some really great work right now. The LS53 silicone head in light tan looks sexy as well!
Stats from YourDoll:
Bust 77cm/30.3in
Waist: 55cm/21.7in
Hips: 95cm/37.4in
Weight: 27kg/59 lbs This weight doesn't seem possible. Angelkiss, YourDoll, Cubiko..anyone want to weigh in on this stat ( )
Good luck taking your eyes off that last photo Now, if only Angelkiss could make a similar body type in the 172-175 cm range with smaller breasts than their current 175 doll I would be the first one to order haha.
Meet Kristina (Starpery 165G Silicone) viewtopic.php?t=163445
Re: NEW AK8 168
Mr. D
”Heavenly Skye”, my WM166C with 124 head
“Lexi Ducati”, my WM166C with 368 head
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2022 11:07 am
- Contact:
Re: NEW AK8 168
Re: NEW AK8 168
I'm thinking the reason behind that because they are using weight reduction as a standard in these dolls that's the only other way but I think this is good development we can now have dolls we can lift without strugglingLifeguard_On_Duty wrote: ↑Tue Jan 30, 2024 4:44 pm I agree that the quoted weight doesn’t seem real. How could this model weigh less than the 162 cm AK7 model despite being 6 cm taller and having slightly larger dimensions in every other area? Something doesn’t add up.
Re: NEW AK8 168
-
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2022 12:36 am
- Contact:
Re: NEW AK8 168
Lifeguard_On_Duty wrote: ↑Tue Jan 30, 2024 4:44 pm I agree that the quoted weight doesn’t seem real. How could this model weigh less than the 162 cm AK7 model despite being 6 cm taller and having slightly larger dimensions in every other area? Something doesn’t add up.
I've actually seen contradictions in the quoted weight of this doll depending on which vendor site you look at. One vendor has it listed at the weight I have above, another has it listed at a little heavier-30kg / 66lbs.
I know that Cubiko had posted about 2 months ago that he is often in touch with WM/Angelkiss before a doll goes into production. He had mentioned, I think it was the AK7 model, that he had suggested to them less weight reduction foam in that doll before going into full production so that the doll would be as soft as possible. I wonder if that is the issue here; it's a taller doll but it's packed with more weight reduction foam to keep it lighter?
Meet Kristina (Starpery 165G Silicone) viewtopic.php?t=163445
-
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2022 12:36 am
- Contact:
Re: NEW AK8 168
I know you're a big fan lol.. saw your post in the other thread
All four new AK dolls, the 157, 162, 167, and 168 are damn hot. Pretty similar body types with subtle differences in breast size. But I like all 4. Still waiting for them to do a taller doll, like 170-175cm but with smaller breasts (A or B cup) and more naturally shaped thighs and legs than the current 175D. Not that there's anything wrong with the 175D though.
Meet Kristina (Starpery 165G Silicone) viewtopic.php?t=163445
- gestaltnier3470
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:49 am
- Contact:
Re: NEW AK8 168
I'm the same when it comes to wanting a 170-175cm doll, except I want a 175cm doll with slightly larger(not outrageously large) but naturally shaped breasts (like E cup) and a sender, realistic and perfectly balanced 90-60-90 with a 70 cm underbust and the shoulders matching both the bust and hips; hence, the desired 175 E-Cup Silicone doll with a perfectly balanced 90-60-90 figure. Not that there's anything wrong with tall dolls with smaller bust sizes or the 175D, though. If anything, there aren't many dolls that exceed the 170cm mark and I do hope that changes sooner or later.mathieu242 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 30, 2024 10:03 pm
I know you're a big fan lol.. saw your post in the other thread
All four new AK dolls, the 157, 162, 167, and 168 are damn hot. Pretty similar body types with subtle differences in breast size. But I like all 4. Still waiting for them to do a taller doll, like 170-175cm but with smaller breasts (A or B cup) and more naturally shaped thighs and legs than the current 175D. Not that there's anything wrong with the 175D though.
Cheers!
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2022 2:32 pm
- Contact:
Re: NEW AK8 168
mathieu242 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 30, 2024 10:03 pm
I know you're a big fan lol.. saw your post in the other thread
All four new AK dolls, the 157, 162, 167, and 168 are damn hot. Pretty similar body types with subtle differences in breast size. But I like all 4. Still waiting for them to do a taller doll, like 170-175cm but with smaller breasts (A or B cup) and more naturally shaped thighs and legs than the current 175D. Not that there's anything wrong with the 175D though.
Yes - I plan on ordering the 162C, but will probably wait until the fingers/hands are the 3.0 version. So exciting!
Aurora 2.0 (Tantaly torso doll) (Jan, 2024) Great with VR porn!
- Siliconeman
- Doll Elder
- Posts: 3288
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 11:18 pm
- Location: Scandinavia
- Contact:
Re: NEW AK8 168
Die Hoffnung stirbt zuletzt
-Hope dies last-
- Your Doll
- VENDOR
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 11:42 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: NEW AK8 168
- Get In-Stock Dolls in 5-10 days: https://www.yourdoll.com/in-stock/
❤Follow YourDoll On: Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | Youtube
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2022 11:07 am
- Contact:
Re: NEW AK8 168
- goofy_dr_love
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 624
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 6:27 am
- Contact:
Re: NEW AK8 168
I saw a demo video of the 162 C one. They showed the softness of vagina and anal. Surprisingly they looked very soft and elastic(stretched quite a bit without tear).Lifeguard_On_Duty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:39 pm I hope to see some videos at some point demonstrating the softness of this body, because I worry about that aspect given how light it is. I get the feeling that it might be hard as a rock in certain areas.
starpery 148 F Wayne - silicone - review viewtopic.php?t=173241
Dolls i own:
CST doll 150 F Cherry - silicone
Happy doll 168cm E Elf - fabric
Tayu 151 E+ Peach - silicone - review viewtopic.php?t=173737
Wish list:
Elsa babe 148cm L DHR009 silicone
SE doll 155 F 068SO-2 Silicone
Tayu 161cm F Katniss silicone
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2022 11:07 am
- Contact:
Re: NEW AK8 168
Yeah I saw that, too. It looked very impressive! However, my concern with this 168 cm body is that despite this one being taller and larger, it actually weighs slightly less than that 162 cm one. My fear is that the only way that could be achieved is to sacrifice all softness, but I’m willing to be proven wrong.goofy_dr_love wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:45 pmI saw a demo video of the 162 C one. They showed the softness of vagina and anal. Surprisingly they looked very soft and elastic(stretched quite a bit without tear).Lifeguard_On_Duty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:39 pm I hope to see some videos at some point demonstrating the softness of this body, because I worry about that aspect given how light it is. I get the feeling that it might be hard as a rock in certain areas.