www.siliconelovers.com

Lushdoll 162 G

Silicone Lovers provides a bespoke customer service to suit individual needs and a full money back guarantee, free worldwide shipping and 24/7 customer support. All of our beautiful dolls are fully customizable at no extra charge. Packaging and payment methods are always discreet and privacy is always protected. They are completely transparent with their prices and there are never any hidden fees or charges. www.siliconelovers.com
Blacknight323
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Tue May 04, 2021 9:52 am
Contact:

Re: Lushdoll 162 G

Post by Blacknight323 »

Francis wrote: Thu Feb 29, 2024 2:50 pm That's surprising that this doll doesn't interest anybody.
She's a better doll than the wm163H, she's awesome and great lhp, not expensive , but.. 🤨🤔🤔🤔🤔🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
I think she does interest people but she’s 106 lbs. and one of the biggest tips doll veterans give is make sure to start with a doll with lower weight. And us as doll veterans know if we want that much to lift or not. Personally I want her but she’s the same weight as my irontech I retired, I could lift her and position her but it wasn’t fun. So I think people just personally opt for the smaller 153E or 156E which are more manageable in weight yet still very curvy. Also lushdoll is only on siliconelovers, out of all the certified vendors, and is still fairly new as a company.
My dolls collective thread:
viewtopic.php?t=171741

MY DOLLS:
Natalie WM 157B / 273 viewtopic.php?t=165397

Stephanie WM 157B / 242 (shares body with Natalie) viewtopic.php?t=165521

Brittanie/Courtnie LushDoll 172H(heads 1&4)

User avatar
Evergreen
Contributing Poster
Contributing Poster
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2024 9:06 pm
Location: Vermont
Contact:

Re: Lushdoll 162 G

Post by Evergreen »

I'm looking for my first doll right now. Lushdoll would seem to be a good choice maybe? They seem nicer than the other brands I'm seeing in my $800-$1200 range. The 156/E seems like way to go for a fan of curvy/BBW who also hears the forum wisdom of not going too heavy. Most of the ones I've loved the looks of so far are 50KG, but 156/E is a bit lighter at 39KG.

street424
Contributing Poster
Contributing Poster
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 8:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Lushdoll 162 G

Post by street424 »

Evergreen. I have the 156, and I have to say. What a doll. I have a 170h, and a zelex 170. And by far this 156 is one of my favorite. Only one small complaint I have that wish she was a bit taller, so I'm leaning towards buying a 168 next

Streaker
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 127
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 11:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Lushdoll 162 G

Post by Streaker »

How has she held up long term? Any tearing? This is one of the better anatomically correct body/lhp/booty/thigh dolls I have seen.

User avatar
nicvncnt
Doll Mentor
Doll Mentor
Posts: 1506
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2001 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: Lushdoll 162 G

Post by nicvncnt »

Lushdoll makes some great realistic sculpts but they are all quite heavy and another TDF member has reviewed their 158C to say that the advertised weight of 32kg is way below the actual weight of 39kg so I wouldn't bet on the 162G being "only" 48.5kg either. If you want a thicker doll with a manageable weight then go for silicone, but of course that's more expensive than TPE and doesn't feel as good. Then again if it's realistic-feeling boobs you want then go with a WM body, even thought their sculpts are not the most realistic. Having seen a video of the Lushdoll gel boobs movement I was not at all impressed with their realism.

Francis
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 239
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2022 11:39 am
Contact:

Re: Lushdoll 162 G

Post by Francis »

Streaker wrote: Mon Apr 29, 2024 10:19 am How has she held up long term? Any tearing? This is one of the better anatomically correct body/lhp/booty/thigh dolls I have seen.
Nothing.
She is ever in good condition.

Post Reply

INFORMATIONS