New head Luna with new body 174SEVO now released!!!-----------EXDOLL

Post by **Doll Sweet - EXdoll** » Wed Apr 17, 2024 9:17 pm

Luna, a new girl from Ukiyo-E series, with our new 174SEVO body, it also has 174SEVO PRO version available.

goofy_dr_love · Post by **goofy_dr_love** » Thu Apr 18, 2024 1:51 am

Saw her on rosemarydoll.com. She looks stunning from the front and lovely body that makes you want her. However no back pictures on doggy position too clearly see the LHP.

Jugo · Post by **Jugo** » Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:38 pm

goofy_dr_love wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 1:51 am Saw her on rosemarydoll.com. She looks stunning from the front and lovely body that makes you want her. However no back pictures on doggy position too clearly see the LHP.

Exactly what I am waiting for as well.

Post by **Doll Sweet - EXdoll** » Fri Apr 19, 2024 8:53 pm

Naked photos.

TwoReflections · Post by **TwoReflections** » Sat Apr 20, 2024 3:39 pm

I love the fact that more and more doll companies are starting to make dolls taller than 170cm, and besides the boobs the body seems to have realistic proportions as well. I don't understand why the LHP is so bad though, ExDoll should know better by now.

Rollo62 · Post by **Rollo62** » Sun Apr 21, 2024 4:41 am

I appreciate the slightly forward positioned LHP. This is extremely helpful if the owner doesn't care for doggie, but wants to look into the face of the doll while having sex with her (either in missionary or girl-on-top). And I ask myself if the constant nagging about "bad LHP" is really the opinion of the majority on TDF.
Personally, I'm very interested in this doll. It has a beautiful and realistic body.

goofy_dr_love · Post by **goofy_dr_love** » Sun Apr 21, 2024 7:23 am

Rollo62 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 4:41 am I appreciate the slightly forward positioned LHP. This is extremely helpful if the owner doesn't care for doggie, but wants to look into the face of the doll while having sex with her (either in missionary or girl-on-top). And I ask myself if the constant nagging about "bad LHP" is really the opinion of the majority on TDF.
Personally, I'm very interested in this doll. It has a beautiful and realistic body.

From a decade of experience with dolls i can say from my experience that anatomically correct love holes is a must regardless of the position you want to use the doll. I have experienced quite a few bad placed LHP dolls and even missionary was a challenge. When WM was at the beginning that was the least of their worries. When you are in your first year or maybe 2 everything is good and works for you. Once years pass you care more about usability and how she looks comes 2nd. At least that is my experience and i use dolls for sex.

Jugo · Post by **Jugo** » Sun Apr 21, 2024 3:15 pm

For those who do not recognise her, she is based on the cartoon character Boa Hancock from the manga One Piece.

Post by **Doll Sweet - EXdoll** » Sun Apr 21, 2024 8:40 pm

Her size chart.

serotta · Post by **serotta** » Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:48 am

If I could provide some constructive feedback to EX, the doll industry already has too many heavy, giant-boobed dolls. I appreciate that some people are niche buyers, but most people aren't. The industry is in dire need of a few dolls that are sensibly designed to be attractive, plausible, normal height, and low weight.

An ideal design for many buyers would be: 163C, 27-28 kg, shoulders 37, under bust 68, waist 60, hips 90.

There is full support for this design here: viewtopic.php?t=180116