Brand New! 156 cm Body with Smaller Breast!!

Post by **ILDoll** » Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:23 am

Hi all

Sorry for such a long expectation of people who have been concerned with this. It still takes a week or two for H.R. progress. However, I have got some photo of it. Kind of unofficial presentation. :haha4:

Ok, let's see some "spy shot", taken secretly with poor lighting.

: 5c99f0c2c93064b38fec30cb4827e84.jpg (2.39 MiB) Viewed 6641 times

: 7ac31a367a3c4b3a2f6dd365d5ffc84.jpg (2.02 MiB) Viewed 6641 times

: 0c3cc7c6d44992384b9b0215b04982e.jpg (1.77 MiB) Viewed 6641 times

: fb02621c6fb89af8aaef8cd67797e18.jpg (1.79 MiB) Viewed 6641 times

: 0b0882c8abf1c19af0226ca8bad2970.jpg (2.7 MiB) Viewed 6641 times

As a twin of 151, most details are quite the same. We may learn this from the elegant hand with such long fingers.

In the last thread C.A. and ManyCan showed their interest in smaller breast. Also I received some emails from other customers talking about their preference of A-cup. After daily persuading, boss agreed to make one. I think this breast is quite small enough to be natural. Hope you like it.
Personally I think the stomach is not round enough. Maybe it would be better with another pose.

Here is the specifications.

: 156 spec.png (8.02 KiB) Viewed 6641 times

Price of it is still uncertain. Boss is doing the math about it. From my point of view, it would be higher than 151 and a bit lower than 162.

So, please let me know what you think and share your thoughts here.

Thank you!

Kevin

Pummelbrook · Post by **Pummelbrook** » Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:45 am

Looks very promising!

MattUK · Post by **MattUK** » Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:16 am

Looks nice, but no way is that an A cup.

Taylr · Post by **Taylr** » Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:44 am

My ex was an A cup and she would have loved having these to top off her body. They don't look like As to me, either.

Post by **ILDoll** » Thu Mar 12, 2020 7:17 am

Oh, the plastic just prevents the body from dust before H.R. painting. Otherwise workers must clean it over again before the progress. Hope nothing misleads you Taylr.

Best,
Kevin

Taylr · Post by **Taylr** » Thu Mar 12, 2020 9:03 am

ILDoll wrote:Oh, the plastic just prevents the body from dust before H.R. painting. Otherwise workers must clean it over again before the progress. Hope nothing misleads you Taylr. Best, Kevin

I'm a bit confused by your reply, Kevin, as my comment referred to breast size, not the plastic cover.

Post by **ILDoll** » Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:12 am

Opps, sorry. It is quite small enough isn't it?

Sino-Mike · Post by **Sino-Mike** » Thu Mar 12, 2020 5:57 pm

Is the 156cm 30kg weight for TPE or silicone? If it is silicone, why is the weight higher than that of the 160cm, given the 156cm is smaller? If it is for TPE, what is the weight of the 156cm silicone?

Post by **ILDoll** » Thu Mar 12, 2020 11:33 pm

Sino-Mike wrote:Is the 156cm 30kg weight for TPE or silicone? If it is silicone, why is the weight higher than that of the 160cm, given the 156cm is smaller? If it is for TPE, what is the weight of the 156cm silicone?

It is silicone. The reason it weights more than 160 is the proportion. As I mentioned, 156 is a twin of 151. The same question came when 151 was released.

silicone 150 23 kg
silicone 151 28 kg
silicone 156 30 kg
silicone 160 27 kg

As we know, proportion is one of the factors for weight besides height. Great example is that our 170 is more or less heavier than any 170+ from other brands when made of the same material.

Someone asked me that why 151 is even a bit heavier than 160bb. It is quite the same question as Sino-Mike. 151 is based on weight reduction of silicone. Therefore we made it referring to human proportion. She has thicker arms and legs, wider shoulder and a round stomach. I consider if any of you still remmeber the photos comparing the arms and legs of 160bb and 151 during the presentation of 151. So this doubt has the same answer.

Btw, the weight I list is the lightest version of these models. It will be 2-3kg heavier if you choose gel-filled breast or other options which brings more weight.

Best,
Kevin

Post by **ILDoll** » Fri Mar 13, 2020 1:25 am

Latest news from factory is that this body is still NOT the final version. Mold workers are dealing with the front part of upper body, which takes about several days I think.

Best,
Kevin

DexterQuest · Post by **DexterQuest** » Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:48 am

ILDoll wrote:Opps, sorry. It is quite small enough isn't it?

Those are bigger than average breasts in my opinion.
Small breasts examples: Chanel Shortcake, Jessie Saint, Rhiannon Ryder, Nella Jones.

Post by **ILDoll** » Fri Mar 13, 2020 6:18 am

I got some more photos about the proportion just then.

: perimeter of 156's arm.jpg (2.64 MiB) Viewed 6335 times

: perimeter of 156's thigh.jpg (2.25 MiB) Viewed 6335 times

: perimeter of 156's calf.jpg (2.34 MiB) Viewed 6335 times

Please let me know if there is any doubt about the specification.

Those are bigger than average breasts in my opinion.
Small breasts examples: Chanel Shortcake, Jessie Saint, Rhiannon Ryder, Nella Jones.

That's a pity if they are still too big for you as the proportion is better than most of the current models.

Best,
Kevin

Sino-Mike · Post by **Sino-Mike** » Sun Mar 15, 2020 4:24 pm

Thanks, Kevin, for your answers on the new 156cm model.
Please correct me if wrong, even if the 160 has longer legs, arms, bigger breasts, larger shoulders and waistline, the shorter 156 weights 3kg more because it has thicker arms and legs?
Therefore it is not really a "thin" model. This is disappointing as some of us were hoping for a lighter weight than that of the 160. Is the 27kg of the 160 with or without head?

Colonel Angus · Post by **Colonel Angus** » Sun Mar 15, 2020 9:46 pm

Yeah, I hate to say it, but those are at least a c-cup. And, to top it off they don't have any contour or appearance of gravity affecting them, so they look more "fake" or artificial/idealized, instead of like a real girl-next-door. Pity, I was eagerly awaiting a real a-cup from you guys.
Also, I was really hoping for more of an innie vagina/labia design this time too. *Sigh*

Post by **ILDoll** » Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:36 pm

Sino-Mike wrote:Thanks, Kevin, for your answers on the new 156cm model.
Please correct me if wrong, even if the 160 has longer legs, arms, bigger breasts, larger shoulders and waistline, the shorter 156 weights 3kg more because it has thicker arms and legs?
Therefore it is not really a "thin" model. This is disappointing as some of us were hoping for a lighter weight than that of the 160. Is the 27kg of the 160 with or without head?

Just as you say, 3 kg more is exactly for proper proportion. It would be kind of disappointing if any of you aim to less weight. She is not so thin as 150. But we consider 150 is too thin.

Colonel Angus wrote:Yeah, I hate to say it, but those are at least a c-cup. And, to top it off they don't have any contour or appearance of gravity affecting them, so they look more "fake" or artificial/idealized, instead of like a real girl-next-door. Pity, I was eagerly awaiting a real a-cup from you guys.

From the specification, we consider the breast is A+ as the error of between bust and band is 10 cm. Maybe it will be your preference after dressed.

Kevin