Love hole placement 157B v 162E v 166C?

vito · Post by **vito** » Wed Jul 15, 2020 4:16 pm

Does one of these dolls have better love hole placement than the others? I'm hoping to hear from an owner or two about their experience with any of these dolls (or a comparison for those members lucky enough to have several of them).
I've read a few reviews of the 166C that vaginal sex in doggy position is quite difficult unless you're hung like a horse, which I'm not. All of these bodies have alot of sex appeal, but I'd like to enjoy them physically as well as visually. One of my first dolls was the WM 155DD, and she was almost unusable in doggy. The anus was reachable but at a weird angle leading to tearing of the hole.
I currently have a piper doll 150 which I can use in any position possible, but piper doesn't really have any body types similar to these, and their face selection is limited. I've also considered a 6YE 158A for it's LHP, but their face selection is slim as well, and the 166 is just way hotter.
Any input is greatly appreciated, I've been lusting after one of these models for a few months (the 162 and 166 especially), so I'm ready to pull the trigger after becoming more informed of the important details.

Doll Master · Post by **Doll Master** » Wed Jul 15, 2020 4:41 pm

I can't find the video on pornhub but the 162E looked like the best of the three.

The 157's holes are forward, and the 166's are too. But, the 162cm was being sexed from behind while standing and it actually looked pretty realistic.

Post by **bigchilli** » Wed Jul 15, 2020 6:33 pm

166c and 162e both are easily accessible for doggy without being hung like a horse

The sculpt of the 166c vagina for me is the best WM have done,it looks fantastic in my eyes

The 162e vagina looks meh but...feels amazing! much better than the 166c

Having owned both I would say the 166c for looks but for purely sex the 162e is the one to go for

vito · Post by **vito** » Thu Jul 16, 2020 11:49 am

Doll Master - Thanks for the valuable info. I guess I'll have to do some pornhub searching.

bigchilli - Great information. I was leaning towards the 162E due to her realistic proportions, but her weight scares me a bit (since I have to store and transport my dolls to use them.) I've always had 50-60# dolls and find them, just the right weight for playtime and transport. It's interesting that the 162E vagina feels different to the 166, is it textured differently? Do you have a built-in or removable vagina?

Post by **LoveDolls** » Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:15 pm

Hi Vito,

WM use the same vagina texture for all the dolls. The only way to get different internal texture with WM Dolls is order from lovedolls.com. We have many textures to choose from, and this customization is free. You can also choose oral and anal textures.

https://lovedolls.com/pages/customize-sex-doll

For the pornhub videos of the WM166 C cup and 162 E cup you wanted, check out my pornhub channel, I have made jiggle videos for both of those bodies.

https://www.pornhub.com/users/www-lovedolls-com/videos

The video called "Tattoo Model Shows Custom Sex Doll Options from LoveDolls" has the 162cm E cup in, and the 166c video is called "WM 166cm C Cup Sex Doll Jiggle Video with Jasmine Sharma head "

If you have any more questions just let me know

Post by **bigchilli** » Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:42 pm

vito wrote:Doll Master - Thanks for the valuable info. I guess I'll have to do some pornhub searching.

bigchilli - Great information. I was leaning towards the 162E due to her realistic proportions, but her weight scares me a bit (since I have to store and transport my dolls to use them.) I've always had 50-60# dolls and find them, just the right weight for playtime and transport. It's interesting that the 162E vagina feels different to the 166, is it textured differently? Do you have a built-in or removable vagina?

Built ins
I actually got rid of my 162e partly due to weight but the main reason was I couldn't hide 2 dolls from my sons
A decision I regret all the time
I've since introduced my boys to Mia(my 166c) so Im definitely planning on getting another 162e this year 100%
The 162e is only a few kg's heavier than the 166c but it felt more

I don't think the texturing is different just the design
The 162e has a very small opening,literally finger width
Round design vagina
The 166c is more an elongated slit design

TBH the 157b has been near the top of my list for a while
I just don't like the vagina design,it keeps stopping me from buying one

Dolllove1991 · Post by **Dolllove1991** » Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:59 pm

The 157B i had no problem with doing doggystyle in the vagina im only 5.5 or 6 inches. Just proper positioning. But i did not have to arch her back in to make it happen just had to bend her over and have her legs in the right place and it was very easy and enjoyable. However prone bone was to hard to do. I will be ordering the 166C soon to let you know.

Dolllove1991 · Post by **Dolllove1991** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 8:39 pm

In these photos the 166C placement seems improved from dolls i have owned in the past. When people complain about LHP i think it needs to be said that their are other factors such as the thigh thickness, ass thickness, year it was made, how good or bad the placement is, softness of TPE the TPE is much softer now then it was with my first doll in 2015.

The 157 B I own was made in 2020 and is a newer doll it was the easiest to do doggystyle out of my WM 170H WM160 B WM 140 D YL 148 D that were all made between 2015 and 2018.

The thigh thickness on the 157 is smaller then the 170 160 the ass is aswell and they seemed to be better positioned aswell the LHP. So even tho there is alot of complaning about WM LHP I don't believe its every model and I don't believe everyone complaining has experienced every model to know. Can anyone else with the 166C or 157B attest to the LPH being good? Or better then previous models?

Doll_Banger · Post by **Doll_Banger** » Sat Jul 18, 2020 12:15 pm

Hey Vito. i have all three of these dolls, and they are all made within the last few years. The best one for doggy style sex is the 166C due to how its built like dolllove1991 said. But if doggy is your preference, please look seriously at a few of the newer 6ye dolls, they are built for it!

Doll Master · Post by **Doll Master** » Sun Jul 19, 2020 2:52 am

Found the video.
It's actually anal sex with the 162E.
And that's probably due to the forward placement.

lakpld · Post by **lakpld** » Sun Aug 16, 2020 7:22 am

just curious how the vaginal placement on the WM 166C is like for cowgirl?

I previously had a 6YE 166A and the vagina placement was too "forward". So if I tried cowgirl, I had to almost lay her flat on top of me to get things to line up.

Hopefully you guy know what I mean?

Post by **bigchilli** » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:55 am

lakpld wrote:just curious how the vaginal placement on the WM 166C is like for cowgirl?

I previously had a 6YE 166A and the vagina placement was too "forward". So if I tried cowgirl, I had to almost lay her flat on top of me to get things to line up.

Hopefully you guy know what I mean?

Awesome!!
It's the only position I do with Mia
Chest to chest
Her sitting upright or leaning back
All work amazingly well

Mia's joints are very loose now so she moves very fluidly, obviously this helps

Pumpster · Post by **Pumpster** » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:56 am

Doll Master wrote:Found the video.
It's actually anal sex with the 162E.
And that's probably due to the forward placement.

Offtopic but I couldn't help but laugh when I heard the familiar rattle of the doll head

Post by **bigchilli** » Sun Aug 16, 2020 9:00 am

Pumpster wrote:
Doll Master wrote:Found the video.
It's actually anal sex with the 162E.
And that's probably due to the forward placement.

Offtopic but I couldn't help but laugh when I heard the familiar rattle of the doll head

Mine doesn't do this
PTFE tape and adjusting the little grub screws on the connector will stop any rattle
Needs doing every few months though