Yes I can get those for you. Any in particular you are after? I also noticed I didn’t show her backside either. I’ll get those up as well.Siliconeman wrote: ↑Sun Jun 18, 2023 10:47 pm Thank you for your review.
Congratulations on your new girl! Lushdoll looks great at the pictures. If possible, we would like to see her in sexual positions too. Lushdoll promotional pictures promise excellent LHP on her and it would be nice to see this in reality.
Cheers!
Sili
Just ordered my first Lushdoll, the 158 cm Layla
Re: Just ordered my first Lushdoll, the 158 cm Layla
- Siliconeman
- Doll Elder
- Posts: 3166
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 11:18 pm
- Location: Scandinavia
- Contact:
Re: Just ordered my first Lushdoll, the 158 cm Layla
Basic doggie style and missionary positions will do.JRG wrote: ↑Mon Jun 19, 2023 9:45 amYes I can get those for you. Any in particular you are after? I also noticed I didn’t show her backside either. I’ll get those up as well.Siliconeman wrote: ↑Sun Jun 18, 2023 10:47 pm Thank you for your review.
Congratulations on your new girl! Lushdoll looks great at the pictures. If possible, we would like to see her in sexual positions too. Lushdoll promotional pictures promise excellent LHP on her and it would be nice to see this in reality.
Cheers!
Sili
Thank you if you have the time and energy to do this!
Cheers!
Sili
Re: Just ordered my first Lushdoll, the 158 cm Layla
It won’t be for some time. I travel from home for work and won’t be back until next weekSiliconeman wrote: ↑Mon Jun 19, 2023 11:37 amBasic doggie style and missionary positions will do.JRG wrote: ↑Mon Jun 19, 2023 9:45 amYes I can get those for you. Any in particular you are after? I also noticed I didn’t show her backside either. I’ll get those up as well.Siliconeman wrote: ↑Sun Jun 18, 2023 10:47 pm Thank you for your review.
Congratulations on your new girl! Lushdoll looks great at the pictures. If possible, we would like to see her in sexual positions too. Lushdoll promotional pictures promise excellent LHP on her and it would be nice to see this in reality.
Cheers!
Sili
Thank you if you have the time and energy to do this!
Cheers!
Sili
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2017 1:55 am
- Contact:
Re: Just ordered my first Lushdoll, the 158 cm Layla
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:29 pm
- Contact:
Re: Just ordered my first Lushdoll, the 158 cm Layla
Re: Just ordered my first Lushdoll, the 158 cm Layla
These are real life pictures. Lol I’m not a good photographer, I just snap away with my cell phone. I do have a photo app, but I use it to blur the background, not to enhance the pictures.louierockz wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 10:04 pm Curious to see what these dolls look like in real life. Keep us posted
This is as real as it gets. WM 159 on the Left, LD 158 on the right.
Re: Just ordered my first Lushdoll, the 158 cm Layla
I do too! I don’t have a blonde wig I like with bangs. I might have to do a little shopping.doll_seller_la wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2023 9:30 pm I definitely prefer the bangs look. Have you considered blonde hair with bangs?
Re: Just ordered my first Lushdoll, the 158 cm Layla
Re: Just ordered my first Lushdoll, the 158 cm Layla
Thank you so much! Ugh I’ve been flip flopping between these two but this side by side makes me think Wm 159 is the right girl for me. A little bit more expensive but ultimately in the long run I think 159 is my preferred choiceJRG wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2023 4:31 pmThese are real life pictures. Lol I’m not a good photographer, I just snap away with my cell phone. I do have a photo app, but I use it to blur the background, not to enhance the pictures.louierockz wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 10:04 pm Curious to see what these dolls look like in real life. Keep us posted
This is as real as it gets. WM 159 on the Left, LD 158 on the right.
Re: Just ordered my first Lushdoll, the 158 cm Layla
The 159 is a great sculpt, and WM is one of the best mainstream doll manufacturers in the game. The skeletons and joints are very good, and the tpe quality is high end as well.Finn13 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 3:39 amThank you so much! Ugh I’ve been flip flopping between these two but this side by side makes me think Wm 159 is the right girl for me. A little bit more expensive but ultimately in the long run I think 159 is my preferred choiceJRG wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2023 4:31 pmThese are real life pictures. Lol I’m not a good photographer, I just snap away with my cell phone. I do have a photo app, but I use it to blur the background, not to enhance the pictures.louierockz wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 10:04 pm Curious to see what these dolls look like in real life. Keep us posted
This is as real as it gets. WM 159 on the Left, LD 158 on the right.
I can’t honestly choose which I like better, both have certain qualities that are better than the other, but neither overshadow the other to change my decision. Pros and cons are as follows;
Before I start, I’d like to mention these are observations based on my two dolls, so results may vary. Two other dolls might find completely different results, take it for what it is. So here goes;
The WM has a better quality TPE formula, with less blemishes and abnormalities.
WM has more head sculpts, which are my favorites. The 159 body is a mind blowing sculpt, curvy but athletic at the same time. Yum.
WM has a good skeleton/joints, and wire in the big toes. In 8 months the joints are still strong enough to hold a pose, but not overly tight.
LD has amazing detail in the bodies and heads. Lips are well detailed, and faces look well made. The eyes in the LD seem spring loaded, and hold a pose easily. Factory WM eyes at best are a little vague.
LD LHP is second to none, and the textured interiors are amazing. These dolls are built to please. My WM 159 is good, but the LD seems to have made this a priority.
LD 158 has a sculpt closer to a real woman, nothing seems overblown, cartoonish, or out of place. She looks real. The level of detail, from labia to navel, is impressive.
Cons would be as follows;
WM has an issue with how the vagina is built during the manufacturing process. The skeleton is suspended using string, which causes two holes in the rear of the vag. These go into the core of the body, and is known to cause premature rusting of the skeleton, mold, and breaking backs/hips due to this poor quality control if fluids are introduced into the vagina (um, hello. This is a sex doll right?) WM knows of this and ignores the issue. This is a huge issue for me. Fix the issue! Other manufacturers have it sorted out. Because of this, we as consumers are left to our own means to fix this. There are tutorials here if you are interested addressing the issue, and offering ways to remedy it. My 159 has these holes. I don’t put any fluids in there, it’s too risky. This is the sole reason I am wary about WM dolls. It’s a problem they don’t care to fix. Lushdoll simply does not have this issue.
LD is a touch heavier than the WD, not by much but it is a tad noticeable. I haven’t weighed them, but I’d guess it’s about a five pound or less difference.
The LD has oily patches in various areas, and blemishes in the form of small indentations in various places. The oily spots disappear when powdered, but came back after she was washed. As she is new I’ll wait for a while before I decide if it’s permanent or not. It’s not a major issue by any means, my WM doll didn’t suffer from it though.
The Lushdoll skeleton was looser than the WM in all areas except the neck joint. Both skeletons had almost identical range of movement, and I got the articulated hands in both. I can’t tell any difference. The WM did have wire in the big toe, where the LD were floppy. As a general, the feet on the WM looked a lot better to my eyes. Speaking of skeletons, the WM has help up great over time, with the joints still holding all poses. The left hip creaks a touch, but I’m careful to not stress it too much. As a whole it’s in great shape. The LD is a different story.
It was noticeably looser from the start, which makes it a lot easier to pose, but after a month the left shoulder won’t hold the weight of the arm and slowly drops. Not a major issue to fix if I need to eventually, but it’s not a big enough issue for me to worry about at this time. Both ankle joint are loose as well and won’t hold the foot pointing as well.
If I was doing a lot of posing and photography, this might bug me, but I’m not, so it’s fine. With shoes on she stands great, and no issues. I store them standing leaning on a wall, and not issues with either falling or moving. Little nitpicks, but I thought I would make everyone aware.
So as a conclusion, both dolls have their pros and cons. Neither are better, just different.
I can’t decide, so I’ll keep both. Both are wonderful in their own ways. LD is every bit as good as the veteran WM, and in areas even better. If the LD skeleton would have been a touch tighter, she would have probably edged out the WM as a personal favorite due to the detail, and lack of problems in the vag, in which WM doesn’t seem to want to fix.
So would I buy another LD? Yes I would. If they continue to put out new products and refine the ones they have, they will definitely be a top shelf company in short order.
Re: Just ordered my first Lushdoll, the 158 cm Layla
Excellent comparison. I truly appreciate it. The Wm holes are disappointing but I plan to use female condoms. If I ever feel strong enough to be able to carry doll to bathtub then I may go raw and will need to fill those holes. The LD is slightly cheaper but WM heads seem prettier to me . Like you said they are neck jn neck and I do love both dolls. I think in the end the comparison photo you posted the breasts on the 159 WM are what drew me to her more than then LD. Again thank you for the side by side review! Either way your lucky to have both!JRG wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 9:00 pmThe 159 is a great sculpt, and WM is one of the best mainstream doll manufacturers in the game. The skeletons and joints are very good, and the tpe quality is high end as well.Finn13 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 3:39 amThank you so much! Ugh I’ve been flip flopping between these two but this side by side makes me think Wm 159 is the right girl for me. A little bit more expensive but ultimately in the long run I think 159 is my preferred choiceJRG wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2023 4:31 pmThese are real life pictures. Lol I’m not a good photographer, I just snap away with my cell phone. I do have a photo app, but I use it to blur the background, not to enhance the pictures.louierockz wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 10:04 pm Curious to see what these dolls look like in real life. Keep us posted
This is as real as it gets. WM 159 on the Left, LD 158 on the right.
I can’t honestly choose which I like better, both have certain qualities that are better than the other, but neither overshadow the other to change my decision. Pros and cons are as follows;
Before I start, I’d like to mention these are observations based on my two dolls, so results may vary. Two other dolls might find completely different results, take it for what it is. So here goes;
The WM has a better quality TPE formula, with less blemishes and abnormalities.
WM has more head sculpts, which are my favorites. The 159 body is a mind blowing sculpt, curvy but athletic at the same time. Yum.
WM has a good skeleton/joints, and wire in the big toes. In 8 months the joints are still strong enough to hold a pose, but not overly tight.
LD has amazing detail in the bodies and heads. Lips are well detailed, and faces look well made. The eyes in the LD seem spring loaded, and hold a pose easily. Factory WM eyes at best are a little vague.
LD LHP is second to none, and the textured interiors are amazing. These dolls are built to please. My WM 159 is good, but the LD seems to have made this a priority.
LD 158 has a sculpt closer to a real woman, nothing seems overblown, cartoonish, or out of place. She looks real. The level of detail, from labia to navel, is impressive.
Cons would be as follows;
WM has an issue with how the vagina is built during the manufacturing process. The skeleton is suspended using string, which causes two holes in the rear of the vag. These go into the core of the body, and is known to cause premature rusting of the skeleton, mold, and breaking backs/hips due to this poor quality control if fluids are introduced into the vagina (um, hello. This is a sex doll right?) WM knows of this and ignores the issue. This is a huge issue for me. Fix the issue! Other manufacturers have it sorted out. Because of this, we as consumers are left to our own means to fix this. There are tutorials here if you are interested addressing the issue, and offering ways to remedy it. My 159 has these holes. I don’t put any fluids in there, it’s too risky. This is the sole reason I am wary about WM dolls. It’s a problem they don’t care to fix. Lushdoll simply does not have this issue.
LD is a touch heavier than the WD, not by much but it is a tad noticeable. I haven’t weighed them, but I’d guess it’s about a five pound or less difference.
The LD has oily patches in various areas, and blemishes in the form of small indentations in various places. The oily spots disappear when powdered, but came back after she was washed. As she is new I’ll wait for a while before I decide if it’s permanent or not. It’s not a major issue by any means, my WM doll didn’t suffer from it though.
The Lushdoll skeleton was looser than the WM in all areas except the neck joint. Both skeletons had almost identical range of movement, and I got the articulated hands in both. I can’t tell any difference. The WM did have wire in the big toe, where the LD were floppy. As a general, the feet on the WM looked a lot better to my eyes. Speaking of skeletons, the WM has help up great over time, with the joints still holding all poses. The left hip creaks a touch, but I’m careful to not stress it too much. As a whole it’s in great shape. The LD is a different story.
It was noticeably looser from the start, which makes it a lot easier to pose, but after a month the left shoulder won’t hold the weight of the arm and slowly drops. Not a major issue to fix if I need to eventually, but it’s not a big enough issue for me to worry about at this time. Both ankle joint are loose as well and won’t hold the foot pointing as well.
If I was doing a lot of posing and photography, this might bug me, but I’m not, so it’s fine. With shoes on she stands great, and no issues. I store them standing leaning on a wall, and not issues with either falling or moving. Little nitpicks, but I thought I would make everyone aware.
So as a conclusion, both dolls have their pros and cons. Neither are better, just different.
I can’t decide, so I’ll keep both. Both are wonderful in their own ways. LD is every bit as good as the veteran WM, and in areas even better. If the LD skeleton would have been a touch tighter, she would have probably edged out the WM as a personal favorite due to the detail, and lack of problems in the vag, in which WM doesn’t seem to want to fix.
So would I buy another LD? Yes I would. If they continue to put out new products and refine the ones they have, they will definitely be a top shelf company in short order.
Re: Just ordered my first Lushdoll, the 158 cm Layla
I’ll post a picture of the Lushdoll body with a WM #56 head on it. Both the body and head are tan, and there is a bit of difference in the colors, but it’s hardly noticeable outside of photos. It’s nice they can be mixed. It really opens up the possibilities.
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2023 3:28 am
- Contact:
Re: Just ordered my first Lushdoll, the 158 cm Layla
- homersexual
- Senior Member
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 12:00 am
- Contact: