www.irontechdoll.com

Which IT Silicone models are the realistic bodies?

Irontech Doll brand, is owned and operated by Shenzhen Iron Technology Co.,Ltd. Various new designs and updates on craftsmanship arise here all the time. We keep improving on the design, doll craftsmanship and other details. We know that only great work can meet the customers' demand for beauty.
Website: www.irontechdoll.com
Post Reply
Aeron
Doll Advisor
Doll Advisor
Posts: 833
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 4:42 pm
Contact:

Which IT Silicone models are the realistic bodies?

Post by Aeron »

I am generally aware of the IT Silicone models but I'm not sure on the details of which ones are the realistic bodies. And pictures can be deceiving.

For a realistic doll, I am referring to the following criteria:
1) 160+cm
2) Realistic underbust measurement (~67-70cm). A common weight savings trick TPE dollmakers do is use a very small underbust to create a larger cup size. But these are unrealistic dimensions and make them difficult to fit in regular clothes. The IT166 looks like it has this problem.
2.5) Realistic hip/waist measurement. This is similar to #2 and is another weight saving trick.
3) Balanced torso-to-leg ratio. This is another common issue with TPE dollmakers where they use long legs and a short torso to reduce weight.
4) Good LHP

#1 and #2 are straightforward and can be determined by the specs. But #3 and #4 both require photos at the right angles with the right state of dress.

I think Irontech was originally a TPE maker so a lot of their silicone dolls have a lot of the weight savings tricks you see in TPE. The only IT silicone doll that I'm fairly certain matches these criteria for a realistic body is the IT168, but it's pretty heavy. Are there any other models?
  • The 166 Minus specs look right for #2 but I'm not sure I trust the measurements as the numbers indicate it should be an E cup but the pictures don't look it. I'm also not sure on #3 and very unsure about #4 (LHP) from pictures.
  • Is the 166 regular good on #3 and #4? It's definitely cheating on #2 (measurements indicate it's an E-cup and it looks like it, but the numbers are smaller than the 166 Minus) but might be worth considering if there are no other realistic options for IT silicone.

User avatar
4891d
Doll Oracle
Doll Oracle
Posts: 9653
Joined: Tue May 11, 2021 1:38 pm
Location: Where I feel good.
Contact:

Re: Which IT Silicone models are the realistic bodies?

Post by 4891d »


The most realistic models are the 168 cm and the 166 cm Minus. Both are very realistic.
The 166 cm is quite realistic (but with a waist a little too thin and breasts a little too high in my opinion).

Links to 4891d's dolls-stories. : viewtopic.php?t=156068
Saaskiya, my beautiful gift (Zelex GE04) : viewtopic.php?t=154462
Trixie came to me (Funwest Dolls Trixie) : viewtopic.php?t=155900
Eurydice, a nice surprise (Elsa Babe RHC019)


skra-snarker
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 2:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Which IT Silicone models are the realistic bodies?

Post by skra-snarker »

The 165 is a great looking doll, they've hit a sweet spot on curvy proportions.

However, despite the looks she is deceptively skinny
It's hard to avoid dolls with the under-bust realism issue, I am sure doll makers once saw it as a perfect way to keep weight down and have a large cup size. I think this is a hangover from solid TPE dolls, In real life a women's chest is bigger and all ribs and hard underneath so could be made light with a realistic skeleton and foam filler.
-- Silikodoll 150 G , H1 J7 --

Corpius
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2021 2:12 am
Contact:

Re: Which IT Silicone models are the realistic bodies?

Post by Corpius »

166cm Minus is the most realistic. Pretty sure it was molded after a real woman's body, it can't literally get more real than that.

User avatar
Snowy Tabbert
Active Poster
Active Poster
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2022 8:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Which IT Silicone models are the realistic bodies?

Post by Snowy Tabbert »

The new 163 body seems to be very realistic. It may have become my most favorite IT silicone body. 😍 (Perviously, my favorites were 168, 166 and 166 minus)

User avatar
4891d
Doll Oracle
Doll Oracle
Posts: 9653
Joined: Tue May 11, 2021 1:38 pm
Location: Where I feel good.
Contact:

Re: Which IT Silicone models are the realistic bodies?

Post by 4891d »

Snowy Tabbert wrote: Thu Jun 01, 2023 3:15 pm The new 163 body seems to be very realistic. It may have become my most favorite IT silicone body. 😍 (Perviously, my favorites were 168, 166 and 166 minus)
+ 1 !
I feel as if I wrote this post myself! :wink:

Links to 4891d's dolls-stories. : viewtopic.php?t=156068
Saaskiya, my beautiful gift (Zelex GE04) : viewtopic.php?t=154462
Trixie came to me (Funwest Dolls Trixie) : viewtopic.php?t=155900
Eurydice, a nice surprise (Elsa Babe RHC019)


User avatar
SkyWalker206
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 379
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: Which IT Silicone models are the realistic bodies?

Post by SkyWalker206 »

I am choosing between 163 and 166 minus...
IMO, the 163 has a balance torso-to-leg ratio.
Both 163 and 166 minus have shoulder width 40 cm

Silverfox71
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 278
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:52 pm
Contact:

Re: Which IT Silicone models are the realistic bodies?

Post by Silverfox71 »

The new 163 is in my fav irontech at the mo

User avatar
Panther68
Doll Guru
Doll Guru
Posts: 5016
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:19 am
Location: Peoples Republic of Kalifornia
Contact:

Re: Which IT Silicone models are the realistic bodies?

Post by Panther68 »

skra-snarker wrote: Wed May 31, 2023 7:32 pm The 165 is a great looking doll, they've hit a sweet spot on curvy proportions.

However, despite the looks she is deceptively skinny
It's hard to avoid dolls with the under-bust realism issue, I am sure doll makers once saw it as a perfect way to keep weight down and have a large cup size. I think this is a hangover from solid TPE dolls, In real life a women's chest is bigger and all ribs and hard underneath so could be made light with a realistic skeleton and foam filler.
Well for reference. Here is a photo of Mishka's 165 on the right and my 166 on the left. I just measured my 166 doll's underbust 64 cm.
Attachments
IMG_20230528_202227_467 (1).jpg
IMG_20230528_202227_467 (1).jpg (945.92 KiB) Viewed 878 times

User avatar
Musiclover
Doll Mentor
Doll Mentor
Posts: 1490
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2020 12:14 pm
Location: Great white North
Contact:

Re: Which IT Silicone models are the realistic bodies?

Post by Musiclover »

Check out the new irontech real lady doll
IMG_20230704_195726_760.jpg
IMG_20230704_195726_760.jpg (70.46 KiB) Viewed 775 times
Classy and sassy combined thread viewtopic.php?p=2304597#p2304597
Yvonne, Olivia, carmen 165E viewtopic.php?t=156925
Valerie fashion thread viewtopic.php?t=156315
Scarlett fashion thread viewtopic.php?t=156312
Andi fashion thread viewtopic.php?t=156314
Shawnie thread viewtopic.php?t=149673

User avatar
mebaru
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 269
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2023 11:32 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Which IT Silicone models are the realistic bodies?

Post by mebaru »

Musiclover wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 3:36 pm Check out the new irontech real lady doll
Maybe it is because I am Japanese, but the image in the foreground reminds me of the latest Gundam plastic model with even more realistic and thicker legs... :drinking:
My gal
Irontech 163plus-G TPE Sandra#35 Sarah#67

Post Reply

INFORMATIONS