IT 169cm Silicone S39 Layla

bbc3 · Post by **bbc3** » Wed Aug 23, 2023 2:17 am

Wow, this new silicone body from IT is apparently just 32kg! Damn if this had been available when I was first looking for a doll, I would've gotten this one. It's lighter than my IT 152cm

The IT official site lists bust size as 80 and it looks like a B/C cup to me.

: 169cm1.jpg (133.43 KiB) Viewed 2142 times

: 169cm2.jpg (177.73 KiB) Viewed 2142 times

: 169cm3.jpg (150.93 KiB) Viewed 2142 times

silicone_dreams · Post by **silicone_dreams** » Wed Aug 23, 2023 6:24 pm

Meschler · Post by **Meschler** » Sat Sep 02, 2023 2:18 am

looks promising, personally I would prefer her with bigger breasts (big C oder small D cup would be perfect for her body) but thats just my. Others would prefer even bigger breasts or even A cups....

Anyway, well done.

Keep up your great work,
Meschler

4891d · Post by **4891d** » Sat Sep 02, 2023 2:53 am

Pretty doll!

Among the sellers I saw its weight displayed at 30 kg, 32 kg and 86 lbs (i.e. 39 kg)!
Once again IT stands out for their fanciful communication on weight (for the record the 166 and 166 Minus have long been displayed at the same weight, largely underestimated for the 166 Minus and largely overestimated for the 166).
I am impatiently awaiting reliable measurements by the first buyers. If this doll really weighs 32 kg, or even 30 kg, it will be a great success.

Please, Irontech, provide reliable and clear information about the weight of your dolls to sellers and consumers. This can only enhance the reputation of your dolls (about which I read a lot of positive owner reviews).

SkyWalker206 · Post by **SkyWalker206** » Thu Sep 07, 2023 2:08 am

the actual weight is normally 3-5 kg plus more than website's figures per my experience.

msd1985 · Post by **msd1985** » Thu Sep 07, 2023 4:29 pm

bbc3 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 2:17 am Wow, this new silicone body from IT is apparently just 32kg! Damn if this had been available when I was first looking for a doll, I would've gotten this one. It's lighter than my IT 152cm

The IT official site lists bust size as 80 and it looks like a B/C cup to me.

169cm1.jpg

169cm2.jpg

169cm3.jpg

Beautiful. But her breasts are too small for my personal liking

Meschler · Post by **Meschler** » Sat Sep 09, 2023 12:13 pm

Beautiful. But her breasts are too small for my personal liking

I second this. Imho she would be Perfect with d-Cup breasts. A second Version (169+ with d-Cup breasts) would be Great. Hint, hint to the Folks from irontech Dolls

nameless_void · Post by **nameless_void** » Sat Sep 23, 2023 10:49 pm

She looks perfect, I can't find any more promo photos of her though, where did you get these?

Lurkingway · Post by **Lurkingway** » Sun Sep 24, 2023 7:12 pm

nameless_void wrote: ↑Sat Sep 23, 2023 10:49 pm She looks perfect, I can't find any more promo photos of her though, where did you get these?

viewtopic.php?t=170237

They're also on several TDF vendor approved websites and Irontech's own website.

4891d · Post by **4891d** » Mon Sep 25, 2023 8:58 am

Meschler wrote: ↑Sat Sep 09, 2023 12:13 pm

Beautiful. But her breasts are too small for my personal liking
I second this. Imho she would be Perfect with d-Cup breasts. A second Version (169+ with d-Cup breasts) would be Great. Hint, hint to the Folks from irontech Dolls

I like these small breasts. But IT could offer several breast sizes on some of their models, as do a few other manufacturers (3 to my knowledge).

This 169 cm model likely to interest many buyers due to its relative lightness (and its harmonious silhouette) could be a good basis for proposing a variation.