LHP photos of the SLE series

[Reggster]

@Zelex
Is there a photo of the SLE 171C for this thread?

[haremlover]

I'm about to do a review of a SLE164G

From initial photos the LHP of the 164 looked better than the 172 upon which I commented that the holes appeared too close together and so chose the 164 as a better option. However, I have a fundamental problem with dolls where the anus goes north rather than at an angle tangential to the bum crack.

Dolls are not humans and cannot manoeuvre as a person to accommodate you. Therefore the best hole for use from the rear, especially with a spooning position, is the rear hole and from a spooning position the angle needs to be half of the right-angle going inwards, not just upwards. I wish manufacturers would take notice.

However few dolls are entirely perfect although I have one special one in mind: there are very few which are not a compromise one way or the other. The material of this doll may be exceptionally good for cuddling and being next to in bed.

Best wishes

Harem

[javo0666]

Ive been doing some research. I am really trying to get clear definitive info on the LHP situation. What's your take from this new set of photos?

172E

172cm Standing LHP.jpeg

172cm Arch LHP 1.jpeg

172cm Arch LHP 2.jpeg

NVM, I take it back. Based on those pictures and the amount of back arch...not that good.

For example, the below are what I'd consider god-tier/amazing LHP (notice the lack of an arched back needed for them).

Screenshot 2023-11-02 183304.png

Screenshot 2023-11-02 183321.png

Screenshot 2023-11-02 183401.png

Oh my… which one is the second?

[Feirmor]

I'm about to do a review of a SLE164G

From initial photos the LHP of the 164 looked better than the 172 upon which I commented that the holes appeared too close together and so chose the 164 as a better option. However, I have a fundamental problem with dolls where the anus goes north rather than at an angle tangential to the bum crack.

Dolls are not humans and cannot manoeuvre as a person to accommodate you. Therefore the best hole for use from the rear, especially with a spooning position, is the rear hole and from a spooning position the angle needs to be half of the right-angle going inwards, not just upwards. I wish manufacturers would take notice.

However few dolls are entirely perfect although I have one special one in mind: there are very few which are not a compromise one way or the other. The material of this doll may be exceptionally good for cuddling and being next to in bed.

Best wishes

Harem

I would love to see a full review over the 164G with unboxing and comments on LPH. Thats the one I've been lookin at and haven't really seen a lot of topics on it so seeing this gives me hope!

[LoveFool882]

@Zelex
Is there a photo of the SLE 171C for this thread?

Not sure if the mods will object, but this is a link from a non-TDF site. However, it's officially listed on Zelex's site as a distributor.

Anyway, here's the LHP for the 171C:

https://www.--Non-verified Vendor--/wp-conte ... ZX171C.jpg

Yeah, sure enough, it's not showing up. I can't find that pic in the usual store sites.

Second edit:

Not exactly what you asked for, but here:



Despite what the link says, this is 100% a 171C.

[cycleingking]

Here's some 160J love

18.jpg (113.63 KiB) Viewed 1587 times

9.jpg (73.13 KiB) Viewed 1587 times

17.jpg (78.34 KiB) Viewed 1587 times

Sure I am very partial.... but this butterfly has me flying!!

[Mamilla]

If only they had like different molds.. this doesn't look inviting to me

[haremlover]

For a doll, looks functionally excellent. Can't miss it in action . . .

Best wishes

Harem

[Birdcaller]

I haven't tried it yet as she’s on the way, my ZX160J. She’ll be my first doll. How in the hell can any reputable company not have perfect, or nearly so, LHP on a sex doll, regardless of any other uses of the doll.

I am seriously looking forward to this doll. I’ve heard so much good of Zelex’s SLE series, regardless of size, LHP should be a top priority.

[King Solo]

I haven't tried it yet as she’s on the way, my ZX160J. She’ll be my first doll. How in the hell can any reputable company not have perfect, or nearly so, LHP on a sex doll, regardless of any other uses of the doll.

I am seriously looking forward to this doll. I’ve heard so much good of Zelex’s SLE series, regardless of size, LHP should be a top priority.

Asian men are primarily missionary humpers .... so yeah, there's that to contend too.

[Inkosi Enkhulu]

That thick 160 J looks incredible.

It's about time Zelex focussed on curvy dolls and not those flat silicone girls.

[nahmot]

Ive been doing some research. I am really trying to get clear definitive info on the LHP situation. What's your take from this new set of photos?

172E

172cm Standing LHP.jpeg

172cm Arch LHP 1.jpeg

172cm Arch LHP 2.jpeg

NVM, I take it back. Based on those pictures and the amount of back arch...not that good.

For example, the below are what I'd consider god-tier/amazing LHP (notice the lack of an arched back needed for them).

Screenshot 2023-11-02 183304.png

Screenshot 2023-11-02 183321.png

Screenshot 2023-11-02 183401.png

If it doesnt break any forum rules could you please say what models those are in your pics? you can PM me the answer if you prefer thanks

[cycleingking]

Finally remembered to take a fairly decent LHP shot. These shots dont have the greatest light, but for anyone looking for 160j LHP pics, these are for you. Not sure if any better than some of the promo pics, but happy to contribute

20231201_225103 (1).jpg (1018.59 KiB) Viewed 755 times

20231201_225550.jpg (2.16 MiB) Viewed 755 times

20231201_225523.jpg (2.69 MiB) Viewed 755 times

[setevoltas]

I'm 5'11. If I want to get the 160J vag standing, she's gotta be bent forward at about a 45 degree angle from straight up.

If she were TPE, I'd widen the vag "up" JUST a little bit for comfort. I don't really dare to modify silicone, so I'll live with it.

The legit inner/ outer labia is totally awesome.

[Cameramike]

Nice information keep updating us thanks