SLE game-changing experience

[Bbravo88]

Thanks to this forum (specifically threads like this), it guided me to purchase a Zelex SLE 164CM (w. Head ZXE216) as my first doll ^_^

I'm looking forward to dressing her up and posting photos / info about her once she arrives!

I really like that head. I’m torn between getting a 166k with 203 or a 164 216.

I have a 172 201 already but I got to be honest the giant boobies are tempting me

[Wheezer]

Thanks to this forum (specifically threads like this), it guided me to purchase a Zelex SLE 164CM (w. Head ZXE216) as my first doll ^_^

I'm looking forward to dressing her up and posting photos / info about her once she arrives!

Congrats on your new doll !
If you treat her well she should be a good photo model and bed babe.

Reading and research on her and similar dolls should get you through the waiting process.
Probably best to avoid going wild getting outfits until she arrives.

Enjoy!
... W ...

[SinfulComforts]

Thanks to this forum (specifically threads like this), it guided me to purchase a Zelex SLE 164CM (w. Head ZXE216) as my first doll ^_^

I'm looking forward to dressing her up and posting photos / info about her once she arrives!

Congrats on your new doll !
If you treat her well she should be a good photo model and bed babe.

Reading and research on her and similar dolls should get you through the waiting process.
Probably best to avoid going wild getting outfits until she arrives.

Enjoy!
... W ...

Hah thank you! I have been tempted to buy any clothing bargain I see but I'm going to wait to get some accurate measurements

[SinfulComforts]

Thanks to this forum (specifically threads like this), it guided me to purchase a Zelex SLE 164CM (w. Head ZXE216) as my first doll ^_^

I'm looking forward to dressing her up and posting photos / info about her once she arrives!

I really like that head. I’m torn between getting a 166k with 203 or a 164 216.

I have a 172 201 already but I got to be honest the giant boobies are tempting me

I almost went for the 160 (the most ahem 'blessed' sle doll) but the proportions would've been difficult to fit clothes on ^_^'

I haven't seen much others (if any) with the 216 head surprisingly, but I was drawn to it

I can't imagine you can go wrong with either of your choices haha they are both beautiful configurations!

[Bbravo88]

Hi Reggstar,

Question you will be able to answer. Do they all feel identical in the bedroom dept or does each one feel different? IE is the 171 tighter than the 164?

TIA

[Reggster]

Hi Reggstar,

Question you will be able to answer. Do they all feel identical in the bedroom dept or does each one feel different? IE is the 171 tighter than the 164?

TIA

They all have little differences with shape and appearance. Mostly they are the same inside. The 171 and 172 assholes are more intense in a good way and very pleasurable with some water and lube.
The 171 asshole is tighter than the 164. The 164 has more material in this area so you can squish her around a little to meet your every desire. Their LHP is good and can do many positions other brands can't achieve not just from good placement but also because the material is pliable. So it moves around easier and gives way to your movements more than silicone and better than a tpe is too forgiving. The SLE is just right and creates a more realistic experience.

[Reggster]

The 171 almost seems taller than the 172

[Reggster]

164, 165, 166, 172, 171

[Reggster]

164, 165, 166, 172, 171
As a group and ea with a pic directly behind. Head 206 joins us on the 166 model!

[curious_person]

trying to choose between the 171C and 172E is like trying to choose between a ferrari and a lambo.

[Bree]

The 171 almost seems taller than the 172

I agree, it really does!
These comparisons continue to be so extremely helpful! A BIG thanks again, to you Reggster, for sharing so much info with everyone and how much fun this thread is!

What surprises me is how the left-most 164G appears to tower over her immediate neighbor, the 165D, and with visually so much more meat on her bones yet the 164 is supposedly only 1 lb heavier than the 165.
There is always an error margin from mfg measurements but these latest side by side comparisons make the engineer in me wonder about actual height, weight, bust, waist, hip, inseam, etc.

Are these dolls so good that they are breaking Newton's laws down here on Earth? (Don't answer that one)

[4891d]

The 171 almost seems taller than the 172

I agree, it really does!
These comparisons continue to be so extremely helpful! A BIG thanks again, to you Reggster, for sharing so much info with everyone and how much fun this thread is!

What surprises me is how the left-most 164G appears to tower over her immediate neighbor, the 165D, and with visually so much more meat on her bones yet the 164 is supposedly only 1 lb heavier than the 165.
There is always an error margin from mfg measurements but these latest side by side comparisons make the engineer in me wonder about actual height, weight, bust, waist, hip, inseam, etc.

Are these dolls so good that they are breaking Newton's laws down here on Earth? (Don't answer that one)

In these group photos, dolls on the outside appear systematically wider than when the same dolls are in the middle. I think it's due to the camera Reggster takes the photos with, the lens must have significant distortion at the edges.
This is quite common on many phones and some compact cameras. By comparing certain photos where the position of the dolls is reversed, we see that this distortion is significant.
So to accurately assess the proportions of a doll, select the photos where she is most in the middle of the photo. And to compare it to another model, also look at a photo where this other model is more towards the middle.

[Reggster]

The 171 almost seems taller than the 172

I agree, it really does!
These comparisons continue to be so extremely helpful! A BIG thanks again, to you Reggster, for sharing so much info with everyone and how much fun this thread is!

What surprises me is how the left-most 164G appears to tower over her immediate neighbor, the 165D, and with visually so much more meat on her bones yet the 164 is supposedly only 1 lb heavier than the 165.
There is always an error margin from mfg measurements but these latest side by side comparisons make the engineer in me wonder about actual height, weight, bust, waist, hip, inseam, etc.

Are these dolls so good that they are breaking Newton's laws down here on Earth? (Don't answer that one)

In these group photos, dolls on the outside appear systematically wider than when the same dolls are in the middle. I think it's due to the camera Reggster takes the photos with, the lens must have significant distortion at the edges.
This is quite common on many phones and some compact cameras. By comparing certain photos where the position of the dolls is reversed, we see that this distortion is significant.
So to accurately assess the proportions of a doll, select the photos where she is most in the middle of the photo. And to compare it to another model, also look at a photo where this other model is more towards the middle.

Good observation: My camera distorts the edges of the pictures. Objects near the center are best represented. It's wise to find the doll your looking for near the center of my photos. I try to move around and give them all a chance.
The back on 165 is arched the most and takes away some of her height. The others have less arch and more height but I swear the 171 is taller than this 172, I need to measure.

[Reggster]

172E 206-1 head

[Seabreeze2112]

Hey Regg. Have you found a way to cut down on the static the doll develops? How are you combating it? I see you are showering one. Mine gets covered in lint/ fuzzies. But I know in part it is from my comforter that has a fuzzy underside. . IDK exactly what it's called. I hope it will be better come spring when I remove it.