Do Wickeds have a more reliable taint area than regular RD

blindwebster · Post by **blindwebster** » Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:36 pm

I have noticed that the area between the vaginal and anal opening seems to have more silicone in the Wicked line versus regular Real Dolls. For those who have experience with both, is this the case, or am I just seeing things in photos?

Just curious, as having this area rip is a concern of mine before dropping thousands of dollars. Beings that the Wicked dolls are some I have interest in, it would be nice to know if this area is thicker and more reliable.

regul8 · Post by **regul8** » Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:22 pm

I'm curious too. I am just waiting on purchasing a house before I buy a WD.

Post by **AlexKnight** » Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:51 pm

As an owner of both a Realdoll Body 6 and a Wicked Kaylani doll, I can say, there's not much difference between the amount of material in the taint.

The distance between the anal entry and the insert entry on the Wicked doll is about ¾ of an inch.
Pretty much the same as the distance on my old Body 6.

The only difference is, with the Wicked dolls, there's an insert, while the Body 6 has a fixed entry. This adds some extra padding, meaning, with a fixed entry, penetration puts strain on the material that forms the taint, while with an insert, most of the strain is on the material of the insert, so if it would tear, only the insert would be damaged, which can easily be replaced.