Please make B cup Kimber dolls

seagull · Post by **seagull** » Mon Aug 22, 2022 1:48 am

Nearly missed this one, my routine for viewing forum posts is to empty bladder and not consume food whilst reading anything from the Rev :haha4:

Or wind up on the front page:
"Man loses eye trying to motorboat doll, film at 11"

I'll have to stick to two titties for my own safety.
Rev. Jack

Gary1124 · Post by **Gary1124** » Wed Aug 16, 2023 10:56 pm

I don't think College Girl Kimber would be a nod toward the Juvenile. I have already written Kimber Doll and suggested a more petite version with B-Cups, Slimmer waist and hips, same height and skeleton. Resemblence to Kimber but slightly wider eyes and softer facial features.
I suggested they could market her as Kallie, Konnie, or some catch "K" name. Kimber's younger, 18-24 year old co-ed sister.

Gary1124 · Post by **Gary1124** » Thu Aug 17, 2023 9:00 am

Anung Un Rama wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:10 pm Gents.... As Kimber is AUST based, and Australia has now the most draconian laws in the world regarding doll ownership and its unproven and nefarious but still past into to law philosophy, that speculates connection of dolls ownership to child exploitation and thus prosecutable under the Child protection act, The telecommunications act and the Customs Act here...well it is very unlikely an AU label will produce any entity remotely yhat could be considered as under 18.

Minimal mammary development and minimal overall size would be a field day for bigoted prosecutors and muppet inspectors here...so that ain't ever going to occur IMHO.

I am still trying to convince Fletcher that a Kimber FS deluxe is the go...so basically the Kimber FS but in Platinum silicone as a basic silicone doll budget pack, rather than TPE.

Anung

Okay, so how do other doll manufacturers that produce adult female doll bodies with A or B Cup boobs get around your bigoted muppet inspectors?

https://www.rosemarydoll.com/product/15 ... k-us-only/
Look at the lady in the above link. Would AU customs flag her? She isn't billed as young by Jarliet but she certainly has a college girl look about her.

RevJack · Post by **RevJack** » Thu Aug 17, 2023 9:14 am

Gary1124,
Bro, I an certain I banged her in high school.
I totally support the doll, hell I might buy her because she does look just like a girl I banged in high school. I think all these BS limitations on "rubber dolls" is just stupid Religious zellots trying to gaslight their mental problems onto others.

Joe Bin · Post by **Joe Bin** » Thu Aug 17, 2023 5:20 pm

If they made a B cup Kimber deluxe I would be ordering one this or next month.

Gary1124 · Post by **Gary1124** » Sat Sep 09, 2023 11:02 pm

I think Kimber could run two lines and still keep costs down. They could easily do a B or C Cup Kimber, keep the 158CM. Same skeleton with EVO and Articulated. Same Gel Boobs and foot bolts add literally nothing to costs.
In fact. Standard Kimber already has petite waist and hips by ratio of her breasts. The only mold differences would be the breats. They would have to create a second head. A bit wider eyes and softer appearance.
They could market her as Kimbers younger coed sister. College Freshman.
You know, the crap over Doll appearance is a bit overboard. Politicians worry a freaking Doll is subbing for a Juvenile. A lot of phoney virtue signaling maybe? Subjective whether a Petite, small boobed sexdoll represents a high-school girl or a college girl as physically, there is literally no difference from a 16 year-old to a 20 year-old. Girls reach physical maturity younger than boys. Biologic FACT. I can understand why people would get up in arms about a 4'5" no boob girl sexdoll. Clearly that would resemble a child. But dolls resembling girls in their upper teens? Yeah, okay. Whatever. There are girls on Tictock over 18 Livestreaming and on a glance you would think they're school girls. Just my little soapbox

italianloopy · Post by **italianloopy** » Tue Sep 19, 2023 2:25 pm

B cup is not at all unusual for a grown woman. My ex was B cup or less except for when she was pregnant. I have seen the dolls online that are banned because they resemble young girls. Kimber is not even remotely in that group.

dolltrance · Post by **dolltrance** » Wed Oct 18, 2023 11:48 pm

Gary1124 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 16, 2023 10:56 pm I don't think College Girl Kimber would be a nod toward the Juvenile. I have already written Kimber Doll and suggested a more petite version with B-Cups, Slimmer waist and hips, same height and skeleton. Resemblence to Kimber but slightly wider eyes and softer facial features.
I suggested they could market her as Kallie, Konnie, or some catch "K" name. Kimber's younger, 18-24 year old co-ed sister.

Great idea, I’d buy one.

Nackers · Post by **Nackers** » Thu Oct 19, 2023 12:15 am

Gary1124 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 9:00 am
Anung Un Rama wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:10 pm Gents.... As Kimber is AUST based, and Australia has now the most draconian laws in the world regarding doll ownership and its unproven and nefarious but still past into to law philosophy, that speculates connection of dolls ownership to child exploitation and thus prosecutable under the Child protection act, The telecommunications act and the Customs Act here...well it is very unlikely an AU label will produce any entity remotely yhat could be considered as under 18.

Minimal mammary development and minimal overall size would be a field day for bigoted prosecutors and muppet inspectors here...so that ain't ever going to occur IMHO.

I am still trying to convince Fletcher that a Kimber FS deluxe is the go...so basically the Kimber FS but in Platinum silicone as a basic silicone doll budget pack, rather than TPE.

Anung
Okay, so how do other doll manufacturers that produce adult female doll bodies with A or B Cup boobs get around your bigoted muppet inspectors?

https://www.rosemarydoll.com/product/15 ... k-us-only/
Look at the lady in the above link. Would AU customs flag her? She isn't billed as young by Jarliet but she certainly has a college girl look about her.

Didn't see this comment before so a bit late replying to it. Most legit vendors just won't sell A Cups in Australia. B cups seem to be ok, but it might depend on the overall doll appearance. Some Bs look quite large depending on the body, where some look tiny. Less legit vendors just don't care, so if you buy from O/S you either get lucky and the customs don't inspect the doll (or don't care) and it sails through, or they check and you get the doll seized and a potential knock on the door from the federal police.

For the record it's not just dolls, it's any adult content. So got a porno with a title like "itty bitty titty"... it's not gonna get through. Doesn't matter that pornos are legally required to have proof of performers age so you absolutely know they're adults. If they have even a hint of looking young they're hit with the ban hammer. It's positively stupid, but because it's bundled up as "won't someone protect the children" it's not going to get changed any time soon.

Gary1124 · Post by **Gary1124** » Sat Oct 21, 2023 1:53 am

Glad I live in the States. They know the difference between flesh and bone real teens and plastic/silicone molded to look like teens.
How did such paranoid, unscientific people ever get elected in Oz?

Nackers · Post by **Nackers** » Sat Oct 21, 2023 3:38 am

They're not elected on a platform of "ban the dolls". They're elected on "we'll keep taxes low, provide better hospitals, more jobs, etc". Unfortunately people get a bug up their arse about something and lobby politicians about it so knee-jerk legislation is enacted. Just like politicians in the US or anywhere else in the world. Even more unfortunately, we're such a small minority and (for many of us) quite private about it so it's not like we're going to get thousands of outraged doll owners protesting on the steps of parliament house.

And I hate to be the one to break it to you, but the US is already starting to enact similar laws on a state by state basis. There was a thread about it on here in the last month or so. About half a dozen US states already have similar doll laws. Chances are good more will follow.

seagull · Post by **seagull** » Sat Oct 21, 2023 4:43 am

Nackers

Gary1124 · Post by **Gary1124** » Tue Oct 24, 2023 4:32 pm

I found a couple of really nice aibie girls on a re-seller's site. Not a TDF site but some members have had great transactions with them .
These girls are 157mm. One is a tanned blonde, one is a Jap/American looking girl but the bodies are actually the same doll, just different skin tone and head. I love them for their very normal Boobies although the do work out to 28D American size. The external genitalia detail is outstanding as well. Would be a very realistic lick especially with vaginally scented lube that's available now (not cheap).
The site also has the 148CM AIBEI Christmas Elf girl. I don't particularly have a kink toward Vulcans (unless it's Jolene Blalok on Enterprise) so a different head would be chosen. I really like the tight, youthful, body of that 148cm Christmas Elf doll although at her height and pettiness her boobs still measure in a C but her form is believable for a real human at that height (I've seen 4'8" girls).
Kimber is a good deal but I would prefer more petite and little details like less plastic looking areola texturing and less Dr. 90210 Boob Job looking Boobs. I'm not into augmented Boobs on women.

Gary1124 · Post by **Gary1124** » Tue Oct 24, 2023 11:33 pm

Nackers wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 3:38 am They're not elected on a platform of "ban the dolls". They're elected on "we'll keep taxes low, provide better hospitals, more jobs, etc". Unfortunately people get a bug up their arse about something and lobby politicians about it so knee-jerk legislation is enacted. Just like politicians in the US or anywhere else in the world. Even more unfortunately, we're such a small minority and (for many of us) quite private about it so it's not like we're going to get thousands of outraged doll owners protesting on the steps of parliament house.

And I hate to be the one to break it to you, but the US is already starting to enact similar laws on a state by state basis. There was a thread about it on here in the last month or so. About half a dozen US states already have similar doll laws. Chances are good more will follow.

Well, unless California, New York, New Jersey, Maryland, and Virginia adopt Aussie style laws States cannot stop the dolls they don't like from being delivered. The Ports have Federal Customs. It is a very subjective thing and wouldn't stand most court challenges here. They would have to sufficiently prove intent that the doll owner was actually fantasizing a Minor with the doll. And US Customs isn't about to look at a Doll and say, "hold up. That's a juvenile looking doll addressed to ****** State which provides prohibits such dolls". No, they are worried about Federal Criteria.

Basically, a State enacting laws regulating Sexdolls is a total legislative waste. The laws are relatively unenforceable unless police raid and that isn't likely because they need probable cause to obtain a warrent. The politicos get this legislation through as a token to vocal concerned voters and get re-elected.

Nackers · Post by **Nackers** » Tue Oct 24, 2023 11:41 pm

I'll say this first, I'm not trying to cause offense. That said, how do you think bans start? Most times it's not an outright nationwide thing. It's a snowball that someone starts rolling and it goes to shit. Bear in mind dolls aren't like guns where there is a constitutional protection. Couple that with the fact a lot of people think they're weird, or even if they don't they're never gonna get one so they just ignore them. What that means is if you want to protect your right to own dolls (or rather establish a right to own dolls) then now is the time to do so. It'll be too late once the laws get pushed through.

As for the intent comment, I'm pretty sure that argument won't hold up in court. And even if it does, would you want to have to end up in court to fight it out? Time, money, embarrassment, job loss...