Hole placement

muzaka · Post by **muzaka** » Wed Nov 04, 2020 6:28 pm

I just found out Sinodolls are so realistic looking. They beat every other brands in terms of realism which I love. However, i noticed the vaginal and anal hole placement of the dolls are inaccurate. They are too close to the stomach. Do you know when they will fix this mistake for ALL their dolls? Otherwise I would have made a purchase by now.

ThatOneGuy · Post by **ThatOneGuy** » Wed Nov 04, 2020 7:56 pm

They aren't. If that's a deal breaker then you are better off buying from another doll brand. If you want proper placement on a silicone doll you better be willing to shell out a large sum of money for it.

muzaka · Post by **muzaka** » Thu Nov 05, 2020 5:26 pm

Not really, there are doll brands that are similar in price or better with proper hole placement. I was only asking to see if Sino representatives had an answer if they planned on fixing this issue in the future. Currently Sino has a lot of other brands beat in realism in aesthetics. But their hole placement is worse than even WM dolls. Very unfortunate.

HSP_960 · Post by **HSP_960** » Thu Nov 05, 2020 5:54 pm

muzaka wrote:I just found out Sinodolls are so realistic looking. They beat every other brands in terms of realism which I love. However, i noticed the vaginal and anal hole placement of the dolls are inaccurate. They are too close to the stomach. Do you know when they will fix this mistake for ALL their dolls? Otherwise I would have made a purchase by now.

Thank you for raising this issue. I would have been more inclined to buy a Sinodoll if their LHP was accurate.
Instead, I bought a Piper Doll, which has more accurate LHP.

CoenT · Post by **CoenT** » Thu Nov 05, 2020 6:05 pm

Yeah same reason why I went for XYcolo after I had a closer look at LHP of Sino

esquisseallure · Post by **esquisseallure** » Thu Nov 05, 2020 6:57 pm

muzaka wrote:I just found out Sinodolls are so realistic looking. They beat every other brands in terms of realism which I love. However, i noticed the vaginal and anal hole placement of the dolls are inaccurate. They are too close to the stomach. Do you know when they will fix this mistake for ALL their dolls? Otherwise I would have made a purchase by now.

Sino has proved again and again that LHP isn't important because after their 2nd body, it's been roughly where it is now.

I do like sino but I'll hold my money hostage till the fix it.

After my 4woods was a total disappointment the next best brands are Piper, SM and XYColo.

Colonel Angus · Post by **Colonel Angus** » Thu Nov 05, 2020 6:59 pm

muzaka wrote: They beat every other brands in terms of realism

I disagree with this assessment. Plenty of other companies are far more realistic.

ThatOneGuy · Post by **ThatOneGuy** » Thu Nov 05, 2020 8:23 pm

muzaka wrote:Not really, there are doll brands that are similar in price or better with proper hole placement. I was only asking to see if Sino representatives had an answer if they planned on fixing this issue in the future. Currently Sino has a lot of other brands beat in realism in aesthetics. But their hole placement is worse than even WM dolls. Very unfortunate.

Very few have proper placement. Maybe only 2 or 3 brands total that got it dead on. The rest are either close enough or are like Sino where it's terrible. Anyways here is a quote from the Sino rep in another thread that I will link:

"I would like to take this opportunity to talk about something that comes up in the previous comments.
1. About LHP
I know there are some comments saying that the LHP of Sino-doll is incorrect. Regarding of your comments about this, we will slight adjust the LHP for every new model. Silicone doll does not like a real person. The LHP will become different with poses. If we make the LHP right while the doll is lying down. The LHP will be too near the front when her feet go up. In order to provide better user experience, we adjust the LHP and try to make it suitable for every movement."

viewtopic.php?f=425&t=133429

So basically they are committed to the terrible design.

seagull · Post by **seagull** » Thu Nov 05, 2020 9:16 pm

For Sino, it 'ain't broke, meets most of their customer preferences, sells, 'ain't gunna fix for a minority of dissatisfied customers
Plenty of other doll companies

Dees luver · Post by **Dees luver** » Fri Nov 06, 2020 12:29 am

Colonel Angus wrote:
muzaka wrote: They beat every other brands in terms of realism
I disagree with this assessment. Plenty of other companies are far more realistic.

That is just your opinion, some Sino models are more realistic than others, and the dolls you speak of are twice the price or more

Colonel Angus · Post by **Colonel Angus** » Fri Nov 06, 2020 1:21 am

Dees luver wrote:
Colonel Angus wrote:
muzaka wrote: They beat every other brands in terms of realism
I disagree with this assessment. Plenty of other companies are far more realistic.

That is just your opinion, some Sino models are more realistic than others, and the dolls you speak of are twice the price or more

That's funny, I don't recall mentioning any brand specifically. No need to charge to their defense, all I did was disagree.

Doll Master · Post by **Doll Master** » Fri Nov 06, 2020 3:40 am

Everyone knows how I feel about this brand.

It's an oxymoron to say the doll is hyper realistic when the placement is so forward it looks nothing like a real woman.

Sino has arguably some of the most realistic faces on the market for silicone dolls. That's why this is so frustrating.

Unfortunately, they insist on selling them as a package deal with their forward LHP designs.

If you want a silicone doll that is actually realistic, better look elsewhere.

Also, the release timeline for the new designs is one of the slowest of all the doll manufacturers. WM releases 10 bodies by the time Sino does one.

Niss · Post by **Niss** » Fri Nov 06, 2020 5:34 am

The topic of LHP is always a frustrating one. I remember when my WM 173H arrived she had the same problem with her LHP being too far forward. It was extremely frustrating. In my personal opinion making sure the LHP is as accurate as possible should be a lot higher up on manufacturers priority list.

muzaka · Post by **muzaka** » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:21 am

Seeing all these comments makes me feel like im not crazy so thank you for everyone's perspectives. I'm glad to see many ppl feel the way I do it is very frustrating especially for new doll buyers when the doll arrives and they realize it's either missionary or anal entry only from doggystyle LOL. I do notice many other brands fixing this issue recently like piper, 6ye, irontech. I only asked simply to see if Sino had any plans in the future to fix this bcuz if you read other threads. You can see other brands very responsive to their customer concerns. But Sino definitely has an edge in realism (my opinion). Yes there might be brand with more realism, but the price is almost double. But thanks for the insight everyone.

@thatoneguy thank you for that thread.

Ashajin · Post by **Ashajin** » Fri Nov 06, 2020 2:08 pm

muzaka wrote:I just found out Sinodolls are so realistic looking. They beat every other brands in terms of realism which I love. However, i noticed the vaginal and anal hole placement of the dolls are inaccurate. They are too close to the stomach. Do you know when they will fix this mistake for ALL their dolls? Otherwise I would have made a purchase by now.

(sigh) Not a thing wrong with it. Some poor photographer angled his subject for a clear vaginal shot and Sino's been catching crud for it ever since.

I'd like to hear from those on this thread who both think there is anything wrong with orifice placement and actually have a Sinodoll to know.